Thoughts on the new direction
2006-07-08 by David Cornutt
I have to admit that I'm a bit disappointed about the elimination of the kits. However, maybe there are other ways to achieve some of the objectives. One of the reason I like kits is so I can do mods as I build. And it helps greatly that MOTM modules are so throughly documented. But SMT and tight layouts make hacking difficult. So here's my suggestion: as the new modules are designed, bring certain key signal input and output points out to headers or jumpers. This will give the DIY'er opportunities to reroute signals, add additional controls, external circuitry, etc. I do think the AudioEngine is a cool concept. My suggestion on this: would it be possible to create a Chameleon-like module that allows for some user programming? I'll have to admit I'm not sure how this should work; I kind of had the idea that the Xilinx would be programmed with some kind of simple DSP core, where the user could write processing code in, say, C and download it to the module via serial, JTAGS, or maybe MIDI. Non-volatile memory would allow for code retention with the power off (and the possibility of being able to store several programs and select them with a front panel switch), so that once loaded the module can be disconnected from the computer, for live use or just to get the computer out of the picture. And yes, I will have to admit that I'm one of those who haven't ordered anything in a while. But I think I have a pretty good excuse: my spouse and I are building a house; our builder abandoned the job and we are having to finish the house ourselves and pay for everything with credit cards. Right now, I'm so close to my credit limit that I can't even order a power distribution board!