MOTM

Hey All -

I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
in something like this?

The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
one normalled to the output of the previous unit. Each 'step' has
it's own out. THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.

I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting. I'll post a
sample if folks are interested.

What do you think?

Mike

Cool.

You could have a clock input for each S&H. They'd be normalled together in a
chain, so they normally all run in sync, but you could patch in multiple
clocks for different effects.
--
john

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Marsh" <michael_marsh@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: [motm] New Module suggestion


> Hey All -
>
> I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
> in something like this?
>
> The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
> one normalled to the output of the previous unit. Each 'step' has
> it's own out. THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.
>
> I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
> modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting. I'll post a
> sample if folks are interested.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Mike
>

Yes, neato, and you could also have the input of each stage available
in case you want to use each as separate S&H's.

BTW, I meant Paul Schreiber in my original post (who the hell is Paulk
anyway?)...*sigh* I suck at typing.

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "john mahoney" <jmahoney@g...> wrote:
>
> Cool.
>
> You could have a clock input for each S&H. They'd be normalled
together in a
> chain, so they normally all run in sync, but you could patch in multiple
> clocks for different effects.
> --
> john
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Marsh" <michael_marsh@m...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:37 PM
> Subject: [motm] New Module suggestion
>
>
> > Hey All -
> >
> > I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
> > in something like this?
> >
> > The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
> > one normalled to the output of the previous unit. Each 'step' has
> > it's own out. THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.
> >
> > I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
> > modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting. I'll post a
> > sample if folks are interested.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>

> Yes, neato, and you could also have the input of each stage available
> in case you want to use each as separate S&H's.

Right. Meant to say that, too.

It's basically a quad sample & hold, but with some kind of timing trick (?)
to let it act as a shift register. It's twisting my brain up to think about
it, right now!

How did you model it?
--
john

Using Vaz Modular - it has a Cascading S&H module...

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "john mahoney" <jmahoney@g...> wrote:
>
> > Yes, neato, and you could also have the input of each stage available
> > in case you want to use each as separate S&H's.
>
> Right. Meant to say that, too.
>
> It's basically a quad sample & hold, but with some kind of timing
trick (?)
> to let it act as a shift register. It's twisting my brain up to
think about
> it, right now!
>
> How did you model it?
> --
> john
>

> I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
> in something like this?
>
> The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
> one normalled to the output of the previous unit. Each 'step' has
> it's own out. THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.
>
> I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
> modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting. I'll post a
> sample if folks are interested.
>
> What do you think?

I think http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/tonline_stuff/jhasr.gif

JH.

That's it! Do you have a PCB? My skills in this area are, eh, meager...

Mike

PS - I will post a sample from the modeled version tonight.

m

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "JH." <jhaible@d...> wrote:
>
> > I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
> > in something like this?
> >
> > The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
> > one normalled to the output of the previous unit. Each 'step' has
> > it's own out. THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.
> >
> > I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
> > modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting. I'll post a
> > sample if folks are interested.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I think http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/tonline_stuff/jhasr.gif
>
> JH.
>

Look for the Analog Shift Register at Ken Stone's site:

http://www.cgs.synth.net/

Two of these fit nicely in a 1U MOTM panel.

John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike
> Marsh
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:19 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] Re: New Module suggestion
>
>
> That's it! Do you have a PCB? My skills in this area are, eh, meager...
>
> Mike
>
> PS - I will post a sample from the modeled version tonight.
>
> m
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "JH." <jhaible@d...> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been thinking about a new module; maybe Paulk would be interested
> > > in something like this?
> > >
> > > The idea is a number (3? 4?) of cascaded S&H units with the input of
> > > one normalled to the output of the previous unit. Each 'step' has
> > > it's own out. THis is similar, I think, to Ken Stones ASR.
> > >
> > > I've modeled it using software modulars (I don't have enough S&H
> > > modules in my rack) and it sounds very interesting. I'll post a
> > > sample if folks are interested.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I think http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/tonline_stuff/jhasr.gif
> >
> > JH.
> >
>

Designed in 1925?

>
>I think http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/tonline_stuff/jhasr.gif
>
>JH.
>