Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

V-Drums with modulars Redux

V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-10 by Greg Amann

It sure has a certain romance to tank MIDI entirely and trigger the
modular from the V-Drums directly.  It also sounds like solving the
technical issues to get it to work in a performance setting would
consume A LOT of time and money and, in the end, be re-inventing the
wheel that Roland has spent years perfecting.  I assume that Paul
agrees with this since his silence after my original post was
deafening.  ;-)

So now the technical problem is this:  drum brains allow you to
transmit any MIDI note you want, but they do not allow you to transmit
the various pads on various MIDI channels.  So I will need a MIDI to
CV converter that allows me to split the MIDI stream based on MIDI
notes.  Will the MOTM-650 allow me to send MIDI note "x" to CV1 and
MIDI note "y" to CV2 etc. when "x" and "y" are on the same MIDI channel?

PLL, BFG

PS: When does the MOTM-650 begin shipping?  I ask this out of
curiousity with no intent to torture poor 'ol Pauly.

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-10 by Paul Haneberg

I have a lot of complaints with the way V-Drums do Midi.
When I record V-drums I record the midi stream, but I also record each
pad to its own audio channel.
When I go to edit, I make multiple copies of the midi track, because the
midi track has so much undocumented junk that I often can't tell which
drum is which.  So I compare the timing of the midi hits with the audio
track for each drum and edit till I have a separate midi track for each
drum.  Then I put them all back together into one midi track.
Then I either feed that back into the V-Drums or I use BFD (which sound
far more natural.)
Usually I end up using mostly BFD stuff, but mixing in some V-Drum,
particularly on the kick.

This is all very time consuming, but I like the result.  Even when
recording real drums I often will augment them with V-Drum samples.
Usually I use sound replacer for that, but sometimes I'll EQ and gate a
drum track till I have one drum pretty well isolated, then I feed the
audio signal into the one of the Aux inputs on the V-Drum head.

This give me a midi signal, which I then edit.  (The V-Drum head needs
to be adjusted to treat the audio signal with the right amount of
sensitivity and to minimize multiple triggers.)  Then I use it to
trigger something else such as BFD.

There ought to be a better way, but I haven't found it yet.

Paul Haneberg
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Greg Amann
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:00 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

It sure has a certain romance to tank MIDI entirely and trigger the
modular from the V-Drums directly.  It also sounds like solving the
technical issues to get it to work in a performance setting would
consume A LOT of time and money and, in the end, be re-inventing the
wheel that Roland has spent years perfecting.  I assume that Paul
agrees with this since his silence after my original post was
deafening.  ;-)

So now the technical problem is this:  drum brains allow you to
transmit any MIDI note you want, but they do not allow you to transmit
the various pads on various MIDI channels.  So I will need a MIDI to
CV converter that allows me to split the MIDI stream based on MIDI
notes.  Will the MOTM-650 allow me to send MIDI note "x" to CV1 and
MIDI note "y" to CV2 etc. when "x" and "y" are on the same MIDI channel?

PLL, BFG

PS: When does the MOTM-650 begin shipping?  I ask this out of
curiousity with no intent to torture poor 'ol Pauly.  







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-10 by Greg Amann

Does my limited capacity for intelligent thought deceive me, or is Paul 
H making the case for a better way to handle the V-Drum pads than a 
V-Drum controller?  Frankly, I do not have the h/w design expertise to 
even go near a project of that complexity.

And it sounds like my application is poles apart from Paul H's.  I am an 
improvising performance based musician who virtually never records the 
stuff I do.  My work has sometimes been confused with performance art, 
rather than a concert in the strictest sense.  I need something that 
will allow me to trigger a variety of patches from a variety of pads in 
real time.

Currently the technology that seems to be recommended is Pad to MIDI to 
CV (assuming that I can split MIDI notes onto a variety of CV/triggers 
etc).   Tanking MIDI altogether has a certain conceptual elegance.  But 
the MIDI step does allow for all kinds of control freakyness!

PLL, BFG

Paul Haneberg wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I have a lot of complaints with the way V-Drums do Midi.
> When I record V-drums I record the midi stream, but I also record each
> pad to its own audio channel.
> When I go to edit, I make multiple copies of the midi track, because the
> midi track has so much undocumented junk that I often can't tell which
> drum is which.  So I compare the timing of the midi hits with the audio
> track for each drum and edit till I have a separate midi track for each
> drum.  Then I put them all back together into one midi track.
> Then I either feed that back into the V-Drums or I use BFD (which sound
> far more natural.)
> Usually I end up using mostly BFD stuff, but mixing in some V-Drum,
> particularly on the kick.
>
> This is all very time consuming, but I like the result.  Even when
> recording real drums I often will augment them with V-Drum samples.
> Usually I use sound replacer for that, but sometimes I'll EQ and gate a
> drum track till I have one drum pretty well isolated, then I feed the
> audio signal into the one of the Aux inputs on the V-Drum head.
>
> This give me a midi signal, which I then edit.  (The V-Drum head needs
> to be adjusted to treat the audio signal with the right amount of
> sensitivity and to minimize multiple triggers.)  Then I use it to
> trigger something else such as BFD.
>
> There ought to be a better way, but I haven't found it yet.
>
> Paul Haneberg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Greg Amann
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:00 AM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux
>
> It sure has a certain romance to tank MIDI entirely and trigger the
> modular from the V-Drums directly.  It also sounds like solving the
> technical issues to get it to work in a performance setting would
> consume A LOT of time and money and, in the end, be re-inventing the
> wheel that Roland has spent years perfecting.  I assume that Paul
> agrees with this since his silence after my original post was
> deafening.  ;-)
>
> So now the technical problem is this:  drum brains allow you to
> transmit any MIDI note you want, but they do not allow you to transmit
> the various pads on various MIDI channels.  So I will need a MIDI to
> CV converter that allows me to split the MIDI stream based on MIDI
> notes.  Will the MOTM-650 allow me to send MIDI note "x" to CV1 and
> MIDI note "y" to CV2 etc. when "x" and "y" are on the same MIDI channel?
>
> PLL, BFG
>
> PS: When does the MOTM-650 begin shipping?  I ask this out of
> curiousity with no intent to torture poor 'ol Pauly. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>        
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>        
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-10 by Paul Haneberg

The elegant solution is definitely to go directly from the pads to the
modular via some sort of interface.

Theoretically, midi could be better because you could do splits based on
velocity.  Really what you want is a discrete trigger for each pad hit,
but also a CV output proportional to the velocity of the hit.  With the
V-drums the potential is also there for some kind of CV based on the
position of the stick on the pad.

You could have several trigger outputs selected on the basis of velocity
as well.  The problem is, as you say building an interface.

Alternatively you could use some sort of midi processor to generate the
splits, and possibly get what you want by using it in conjunction with
the 650.

I don't know a midi processor off the top of my head that will do this,
other than the Opcode Studio 5, which is obsolete, and requires a Mac
and the Opcode Patch Editor software to program.  This is what I use.  I
have 2 I use and 1 I keep for parts that no longer works.  They are
quite cranky and obstinate pieces of gear, but they are great when they
work.

It may be possible to generate some usable control signals using a
combination of the S&H in the 101, an 850 and possibly a 700, but the
signal from the pad may need to be amplified first.

If I think of anything else I'll let you know.

Paul Haneberg


-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Amann [mailto:greg.amann@...] 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:54 AM
To: Paul Haneberg
Cc: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

Does my limited capacity for intelligent thought deceive me, or is Paul 
H making the case for a better way to handle the V-Drum pads than a 
V-Drum controller?  Frankly, I do not have the h/w design expertise to 
even go near a project of that complexity.

And it sounds like my application is poles apart from Paul H's.  I am an

improvising performance based musician who virtually never records the 
stuff I do.  My work has sometimes been confused with performance art, 
rather than a concert in the strictest sense.  I need something that 
will allow me to trigger a variety of patches from a variety of pads in 
real time.

Currently the technology that seems to be recommended is Pad to MIDI to 
CV (assuming that I can split MIDI notes onto a variety of CV/triggers 
etc).   Tanking MIDI altogether has a certain conceptual elegance.  But 
the MIDI step does allow for all kinds of control freakyness!

PLL, BFG

Paul Haneberg wrote:

>
> I have a lot of complaints with the way V-Drums do Midi.
> When I record V-drums I record the midi stream, but I also record each
> pad to its own audio channel.
> When I go to edit, I make multiple copies of the midi track, because
the
> midi track has so much undocumented junk that I often can't tell which
> drum is which.  So I compare the timing of the midi hits with the
audio
> track for each drum and edit till I have a separate midi track for
each
> drum.  Then I put them all back together into one midi track.
> Then I either feed that back into the V-Drums or I use BFD (which
sound
> far more natural.)
> Usually I end up using mostly BFD stuff, but mixing in some V-Drum,
> particularly on the kick.
>
> This is all very time consuming, but I like the result.  Even when
> recording real drums I often will augment them with V-Drum samples.
> Usually I use sound replacer for that, but sometimes I'll EQ and gate
a
> drum track till I have one drum pretty well isolated, then I feed the
> audio signal into the one of the Aux inputs on the V-Drum head.
>
> This give me a midi signal, which I then edit.  (The V-Drum head needs
> to be adjusted to treat the audio signal with the right amount of
> sensitivity and to minimize multiple triggers.)  Then I use it to
> trigger something else such as BFD.
>
> There ought to be a better way, but I haven't found it yet.
>
> Paul Haneberg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Greg Amann
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:00 AM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux
>
> It sure has a certain romance to tank MIDI entirely and trigger the
> modular from the V-Drums directly.  It also sounds like solving the
> technical issues to get it to work in a performance setting would
> consume A LOT of time and money and, in the end, be re-inventing the
> wheel that Roland has spent years perfecting.  I assume that Paul
> agrees with this since his silence after my original post was
> deafening.  ;-)
>
> So now the technical problem is this:  drum brains allow you to
> transmit any MIDI note you want, but they do not allow you to transmit
> the various pads on various MIDI channels.  So I will need a MIDI to
> CV converter that allows me to split the MIDI stream based on MIDI
> notes.  Will the MOTM-650 allow me to send MIDI note "x" to CV1 and
> MIDI note "y" to CV2 etc. when "x" and "y" are on the same MIDI
channel?
>
> PLL, BFG
>
> PS: When does the MOTM-650 begin shipping?  I ask this out of
> curiousity with no intent to torture poor 'ol Pauly. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>        
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>        
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-10 by J. Larry Hendry

If one insists on using MIDI and you want to divide the MIDI data into
different channels based on the range of the notes, you can do that with a
digital music MX-8.  While they are out of production, they are readily
available for under $100 on the used market.  I used on for live performance
for years.

It is basically a 6 in 8 out MIDI patchbay with 50 slots of memory.  But,
what separates it from the rest are two assignable and programmable internal
processors which will manipulate the MIDI data in my useful ways.  Once is
to divide a single MIDI channel into 4 zones and 4 different channels based
on note range.  Since there are two processors built in, with a little
thinking, one could write the program to divide the MIDI data into 8 zones,
with the note outputs being on 8 different channels.  The outputs of the two
processors can be merged internally.  Maybe I'll see if I can set up a
program like that on mine and see how it works.  You can also do switching
based on a selectable velocity threshold.  So, you could have one pad have a
couple of different outputs based on how hard it is hit.

It seem like one of the Akai MIDI processor boxes did some zone splitting
too.
Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Paul Haneberg
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:22 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux


The elegant solution is definitely to go directly from the pads to the
modular via some sort of interface.

Theoretically, midi could be better because you could do splits based on
velocity.  Really what you want is a discrete trigger for each pad hit,
but also a CV output proportional to the velocity of the hit.  With the
V-drums the potential is also there for some kind of CV based on the
position of the stick on the pad.

You could have several trigger outputs selected on the basis of velocity
as well.  The problem is, as you say building an interface.

Alternatively you could use some sort of midi processor to generate the
splits, and possibly get what you want by using it in conjunction with
the 650.

I don't know a midi processor off the top of my head that will do this,
other than the Opcode Studio 5, which is obsolete, and requires a Mac
and the Opcode Patch Editor software to program.  This is what I use.  I
have 2 I use and 1 I keep for parts that no longer works.  They are
quite cranky and obstinate pieces of gear, but they are great when they
work.

It may be possible to generate some usable control signals using a
combination of the S&H in the 101, an 850 and possibly a 700, but the
signal from the pad may need to be amplified first.

If I think of anything else I'll let you know.

Paul Haneberg


-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Amann [mailto:greg.amann@...]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:54 AM
To: Paul Haneberg
Cc: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

Does my limited capacity for intelligent thought deceive me, or is Paul
H making the case for a better way to handle the V-Drum pads than a
V-Drum controller?  Frankly, I do not have the h/w design expertise to
even go near a project of that complexity.

And it sounds like my application is poles apart from Paul H's.  I am an

improvising performance based musician who virtually never records the
stuff I do.  My work has sometimes been confused with performance art,
rather than a concert in the strictest sense.  I need something that
will allow me to trigger a variety of patches from a variety of pads in
real time.

Currently the technology that seems to be recommended is Pad to MIDI to
CV (assuming that I can split MIDI notes onto a variety of CV/triggers
etc).   Tanking MIDI altogether has a certain conceptual elegance.  But
the MIDI step does allow for all kinds of control freakyness!

PLL, BFG

Paul Haneberg wrote:

>
> I have a lot of complaints with the way V-Drums do Midi.
> When I record V-drums I record the midi stream, but I also record each
> pad to its own audio channel.
> When I go to edit, I make multiple copies of the midi track, because
the
> midi track has so much undocumented junk that I often can't tell which
> drum is which.  So I compare the timing of the midi hits with the
audio
> track for each drum and edit till I have a separate midi track for
each
> drum.  Then I put them all back together into one midi track.
> Then I either feed that back into the V-Drums or I use BFD (which
sound
> far more natural.)
> Usually I end up using mostly BFD stuff, but mixing in some V-Drum,
> particularly on the kick.
>
> This is all very time consuming, but I like the result.  Even when
> recording real drums I often will augment them with V-Drum samples.
> Usually I use sound replacer for that, but sometimes I'll EQ and gate
a
> drum track till I have one drum pretty well isolated, then I feed the
> audio signal into the one of the Aux inputs on the V-Drum head.
>
> This give me a midi signal, which I then edit.  (The V-Drum head needs
> to be adjusted to treat the audio signal with the right amount of
> sensitivity and to minimize multiple triggers.)  Then I use it to
> trigger something else such as BFD.
>
> There ought to be a better way, but I haven't found it yet.
>
> Paul Haneberg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Greg Amann
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:00 AM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux
>
> It sure has a certain romance to tank MIDI entirely and trigger the
> modular from the V-Drums directly.  It also sounds like solving the
> technical issues to get it to work in a performance setting would
> consume A LOT of time and money and, in the end, be re-inventing the
> wheel that Roland has spent years perfecting.  I assume that Paul
> agrees with this since his silence after my original post was
> deafening.  ;-)
>
> So now the technical problem is this:  drum brains allow you to
> transmit any MIDI note you want, but they do not allow you to transmit
> the various pads on various MIDI channels.  So I will need a MIDI to
> CV converter that allows me to split the MIDI stream based on MIDI
> notes.  Will the MOTM-650 allow me to send MIDI note "x" to CV1 and
> MIDI note "y" to CV2 etc. when "x" and "y" are on the same MIDI
channel?
>
> PLL, BFG
>
> PS: When does the MOTM-650 begin shipping?  I ask this out of
> curiousity with no intent to torture poor 'ol Pauly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>







Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-10 by Mike Marsh

Doesn't Southwest Micro have something like a MIDI splitter designed
for drums?  Also, I thought PAIA had a drum brain thingy that did
trigger to MIDI...

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Haneberg" <phaneber@o...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> The elegant solution is definitely to go directly from the pads to the
> modular via some sort of interface.
> 
> Theoretically, midi could be better because you could do splits based on
> velocity.  Really what you want is a discrete trigger for each pad hit,
> but also a CV output proportional to the velocity of the hit.  With the
> V-drums the potential is also there for some kind of CV based on the
> position of the stick on the pad.
> 
> You could have several trigger outputs selected on the basis of velocity
> as well.  The problem is, as you say building an interface.
> 
> Alternatively you could use some sort of midi processor to generate the
> splits, and possibly get what you want by using it in conjunction with
> the 650.
> 
> I don't know a midi processor off the top of my head that will do this,
> other than the Opcode Studio 5, which is obsolete, and requires a Mac
> and the Opcode Patch Editor software to program.  This is what I use.  I
> have 2 I use and 1 I keep for parts that no longer works.  They are
> quite cranky and obstinate pieces of gear, but they are great when they
> work.
> 
> It may be possible to generate some usable control signals using a
> combination of the S&H in the 101, an 850 and possibly a 700, but the
> signal from the pad may need to be amplified first.
> 
> If I think of anything else I'll let you know.
> 
> Paul Haneberg
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Amann [mailto:greg.amann@s...] 
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:54 AM
> To: Paul Haneberg
> Cc: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux
> 
> Does my limited capacity for intelligent thought deceive me, or is Paul 
> H making the case for a better way to handle the V-Drum pads than a 
> V-Drum controller?  Frankly, I do not have the h/w design expertise to 
> even go near a project of that complexity.
> 
> And it sounds like my application is poles apart from Paul H's.  I am an
> 
> improvising performance based musician who virtually never records the 
> stuff I do.  My work has sometimes been confused with performance art, 
> rather than a concert in the strictest sense.  I need something that 
> will allow me to trigger a variety of patches from a variety of pads in 
> real time.
> 
> Currently the technology that seems to be recommended is Pad to MIDI to 
> CV (assuming that I can split MIDI notes onto a variety of CV/triggers 
> etc).   Tanking MIDI altogether has a certain conceptual elegance.  But 
> the MIDI step does allow for all kinds of control freakyness!
> 
> PLL, BFG
> 
> Paul Haneberg wrote:
> 
> >
> > I have a lot of complaints with the way V-Drums do Midi.
> > When I record V-drums I record the midi stream, but I also record each
> > pad to its own audio channel.
> > When I go to edit, I make multiple copies of the midi track, because
> the
> > midi track has so much undocumented junk that I often can't tell which
> > drum is which.  So I compare the timing of the midi hits with the
> audio
> > track for each drum and edit till I have a separate midi track for
> each
> > drum.  Then I put them all back together into one midi track.
> > Then I either feed that back into the V-Drums or I use BFD (which
> sound
> > far more natural.)
> > Usually I end up using mostly BFD stuff, but mixing in some V-Drum,
> > particularly on the kick.
> >
> > This is all very time consuming, but I like the result.  Even when
> > recording real drums I often will augment them with V-Drum samples.
> > Usually I use sound replacer for that, but sometimes I'll EQ and gate
> a
> > drum track till I have one drum pretty well isolated, then I feed the
> > audio signal into the one of the Aux inputs on the V-Drum head.
> >
> > This give me a midi signal, which I then edit.  (The V-Drum head needs
> > to be adjusted to treat the audio signal with the right amount of
> > sensitivity and to minimize multiple triggers.)  Then I use it to
> > trigger something else such as BFD.
> >
> > There ought to be a better way, but I haven't found it yet.
> >
> > Paul Haneberg
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> > Greg Amann
> > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:00 AM
> > To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux
> >
> > It sure has a certain romance to tank MIDI entirely and trigger the
> > modular from the V-Drums directly.  It also sounds like solving the
> > technical issues to get it to work in a performance setting would
> > consume A LOT of time and money and, in the end, be re-inventing the
> > wheel that Roland has spent years perfecting.  I assume that Paul
> > agrees with this since his silence after my original post was
> > deafening.  ;-)
> >
> > So now the technical problem is this:  drum brains allow you to
> > transmit any MIDI note you want, but they do not allow you to transmit
> > the various pads on various MIDI channels.  So I will need a MIDI to
> > CV converter that allows me to split the MIDI stream based on MIDI
> > notes.  Will the MOTM-650 allow me to send MIDI note "x" to CV1 and
> > MIDI note "y" to CV2 etc. when "x" and "y" are on the same MIDI
> channel?
> >
> > PLL, BFG
> >
> > PS: When does the MOTM-650 begin shipping?  I ask this out of
> > curiousity with no intent to torture poor 'ol Pauly. 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> >     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> >       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
> >        
> >     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >       motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >       <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >        
> >     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> >       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >

Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-11 by Andre Majorel

On 2005-06-10 10:07 -0500, J. Larry Hendry wrote:

> It seem like one of the Akai MIDI processor boxes did some zone
> splitting too.

Akai ME25S MIDI programmable note separator. Up to 4 zones.
Each zone can be transposed by +/- 3 octaves (but not
semitones). Each zone has an optional program change number to
send when a split is loaded. Has two MIDI outs but one UART so
you can't assign zone 1 to out 1 and zone 2 to out 2.

-- 
Andr\ufffd Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Do not use this account for regular correspondence.
See the URL above for contact information.

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-11 by J. Larry Hendry

Thanks Andre.  I knew in the back of my mind one of those little boxes in
the ME series did that.  Sometimes those go pretty cheap.
Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Andre Majorel
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 5:11 AM
To: MOTM List
Subject: Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux


On 2005-06-10 10:07 -0500, J. Larry Hendry wrote:

> It seem like one of the Akai MIDI processor boxes did some zone
> splitting too.

Akai ME25S MIDI programmable note separator. Up to 4 zones.
Each zone can be transposed by +/- 3 octaves (but not
semitones). Each zone has an optional program change number to
send when a split is loaded. Has two MIDI outs but one UART so
you can't assign zone 1 to out 1 and zone 2 to out 2.

--
Andr\ufffd Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Do not use this account for regular correspondence.
See the URL above for contact information.

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-11 by Jason Proctor

the Akai ME25S note splitter allows 4-way double/splits based on midi 
note number. i have one and don't use it, so if anyone wants it let 
me know.

an alternative, i think, but i'll have to check it, is the Roland 
PMC16 trigger-midi converter, which allows a different midi channel 
to be specified for each trigger input. my band has one, i'll dig out 
the manual and find out.

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-14 by Jim Black

And you know the big drawback with Roland's current
offerings... the TMC-6 offers a whopping 6 triggers
inputs! Obviously, made to just be used as an
"expander" to one of their drum brains.

I use a KAT pad. You get the rubber pad (which
triggers fast) and triggers *and* kick drum/ hi-hat
input.


--- Jason Proctor <jason@...> wrote:

> the Akai ME25S note splitter allows 4-way
> double/splits based on midi 
> note number. i have one and don't use it, so if
> anyone wants it let 
> me know.
> 
> an alternative, i think, but i'll have to check it,
> is the Roland 
> PMC16 trigger-midi converter, which allows a
> different midi channel 
> to be specified for each trigger input. my band has
> one, i'll dig out 
> the manual and find out.
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-14 by Jason Proctor

there are also octapads and spd20s etc around.

going back to the pre-midi idea, i'm sure there must be a way (with 
all the voltage control gizmos lurking in people's rigs) to frig the 
output of the pads so that a spike over a certain level produces a 
gate signal and the spike size can be routed to VC velocity. isn't 
there?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>And you know the big drawback with Roland's current
>offerings... the TMC-6 offers a whopping 6 triggers
>inputs! Obviously, made to just be used as an
>"expander" to one of their drum brains.
>
>I use a KAT pad. You get the rubber pad (which
>triggers fast) and triggers *and* kick drum/ hi-hat
>input.

Re: V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-14 by coyoteous

Not exactly what your asking for, but a pre-amp/envelope follower will get you 
a modular-type trigger for envelope generators and a signal useable for 
spiking filters and VCAs. I used to make some monster analog drum sounds 
with a 2600 triggered from pads, drum machines and live or recorded 
acoustic drums. Blacet, Oakley, Synthesizers.com, Doepfer, Modcan, etc. 
have envelope follower modules, though not always referred to as such.

Barry

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Jason Proctor <jason@r...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> there are also octapads and spd20s etc around.
> 
> going back to the pre-midi idea, i'm sure there must be a way (with 
> all the voltage control gizmos lurking in people's rigs) to frig the 
> output of the pads so that a spike over a certain level produces a 
> gate signal and the spike size can be routed to VC velocity. isn't 
> there?
> 
> 
> >And you know the big drawback with Roland's current
> >offerings... the TMC-6 offers a whopping 6 triggers
> >inputs! Obviously, made to just be used as an
> >"expander" to one of their drum brains.
> >
> >I use a KAT pad. You get the rubber pad (which
> >triggers fast) and triggers *and* kick drum/ hi-hat
> >input.

RE: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-24 by Jason Proctor

the TMC actually offers i think a total of 11 triggers, because 5 out 
of the 6 trigger inputs are dual channel to take care of the rim/head 
capabilities of the v-drums themselves. so, with a stereo to mono 
1/4" cable, you could run lots more stuff than initially seems 
possible.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>And you know the big drawback with Roland's current
>offerings... the TMC-6 offers a whopping 6 triggers
>inputs! Obviously, made to just be used as an
>"expander" to one of their drum brains.
>
>I use a KAT pad. You get the rubber pad (which
>triggers fast) and triggers *and* kick drum/ hi-hat
>input.

Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-24 by Greg Amann

The TMC-6 is in fact a "7" input not an "11".  Only channel 2 has the 
setup for the head-rim combo.  :-(

Jason Proctor wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> the TMC actually offers i think a total of 11 triggers, because 5 out
> of the 6 trigger inputs are dual channel to take care of the rim/head
> capabilities of the v-drums themselves. so, with a stereo to mono
> 1/4" cable, you could run lots more stuff than initially seems
> possible.
>
> >And you know the big drawback with Roland's current
> >offerings... the TMC-6 offers a whopping 6 triggers
> >inputs! Obviously, made to just be used as an
> >"expander" to one of their drum brains.
> >
> >I use a KAT pad. You get the rubber pad (which
> >triggers fast) and triggers *and* kick drum/ hi-hat
> >input.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>        
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>        
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>

Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-24 by Jason Proctor

i think there might be more than one version of the TMC-6, then.

the manual says that pretty much all the inputs support head/rim (and 
the funky hi-hat thing makes for more on that input).

on mine however, the kick input does *not* have a head/rim combo 
thing, but the other inputs do.



>The TMC-6 is in fact a "7" input not an "11".  Only channel 2 has 
>the setup for the head-rim combo.  :-(

Re: [motm] V-Drums with modulars Redux

2005-06-24 by Greg Amann

Wow.  Roland must be nuts then.  I bought mine last summer.  And it's 
NOT what you'd call one of their hottest products.  To have removed such 
significant features is nuts.

PLL, BFG


Jason Proctor wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> i think there might be more than one version of the TMC-6, then.
>
> the manual says that pretty much all the inputs support head/rim (and
> the funky hi-hat thing makes for more on that input).
>
> on mine however, the kick input does *not* have a head/rim combo
> thing, but the other inputs do.
>
>
>
> >The TMC-6 is in fact a "7" input not an "11".  Only channel 2 has
> >the setup for the head-rim combo.  :-(
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>        
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>        
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>

Metasonix gear

2005-06-27 by Greg James

Has anybody out here used any of the Metasonix boxes with their MOTM
systems? Do you have any experiences/impressions to share?

-Greg

Re: Metasonix gear

2005-06-28 by alt_mode

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Greg James" <gjames@k...> wrote:
> Has anybody out here used any of the Metasonix boxes with their MOTM
> systems? Do you have any experiences/impressions to share?
> 
> -Greg

Greg,

I've got a few Metasonix modules (bandpass filter and ring mod) and
they work fine with MOTM.  The mounting system for MOTM Rack rails
makes them take up 3 spaces.  

They tend to be rather agressive sounding modules since they use tubes
to distort the sound.  They are unique modules with rather unique
sounds .  Some sounds may be a bit more unusual than you might be
expecting but fun when that is desired.

   Eric

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.