Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Clicking VCA

Clicking VCA

2005-04-07 by Jim Carlile

I'm having problems with my 190 VCA clicking.  Each section of the dual 
VCA has been tested and they're both clicking.  I've taken the 190 out 
from the cabinet and adjusted the two trimmers while running a sequence 
of snappy EGs (zero attack / moderate decay) into the CV inputs.  It 
seems that the two end points of the trimpots make the CV bleedthrough 
relatively loud, while putting it in the middle reduces the clickiness, 
but it is still there and quite noticeable.  I've tried both a MOTM-800 
EG and also a Synthesizers.com EG with the same results.  Is anyone 
else's VCA clicking?
-Jim

Re: [motm] Clicking VCA

2005-04-07 by Paul Schreiber

This was covered last year in the archives.

Basically, there are 2 factors at work:

a) the MOTM-190 is *extremely* fast. If you have fast envelopes (say 
Attack/Release <2ms) and you put in a frequency less that say 1Khz (which is 
pretty high, musically speaking) what you get is less than 1 cycle of the 
waveform coming out. For example, if you are doing bass notes at 80 Hz, the 
period is 1/80 or 12ms. So, if you are "whacking" the VCA with a 1ms attack/1ms 
decay, only 2/12 or 17% of the waveform is 'getting through'. Well, THAT means 
there is an intristic DC offset associated with that waveform. You hear this as 
a 'click'. The VCA is NOT 'clicking', the *waveform* is :)

b) It depends on your 'signal chain' outside the VCA (mixer, preamp, powered 
monitors, whatever) and how THEY handle DC offsets. For example, and this was 4 
years ago with the '110 (not nearly as fast but fast enough), a user was using a 
SoundBlaster clone card for recording. This card had crappy input impedance 
network, crappy electrolytic caps in the audio path, and overall it 
was.....crappy. The thing 'clicked' like a horde of locusts. When I look at it 
and listened to it on my system, it was OK. He sent me MP3s: yet, sounded awful. 
Same card, same setup here: no problems with *my* setup (it was a Turtle Beach 
card at the time).

I can take my arbitrary waveform generator and run in 'gated mode' with an 
internal square wave. This will 'click' as well, again because the 'note' needs 
at least 1 full cycle to balance the charge in the coupling caps. If you are 
doing basslines, this may be up to 15ms.

Now, I'm *not saying* you *have* to use "slow" A/R times to make the popping "go 
away" as a *general rule*, because my Event 20/20bas speakers can 'take it' just 
fine, and so can my Pro Tools/Digi 002. The best thing is:

1) be sure the CV OFFSET trims are properly set.
2) adjust the A/D/R times
3) upgrade your external stuff :)

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Clicking VCA

2005-04-07 by Mike Estee

On a related note (haha) this may be self evident, but I often put the VCA 
before the (LP) filter such that the harmonics from the severed bass wave 
gets filtered out. If I put it after the filter the VCA will cut those low 
notes off too quickly (or out of phase) creating a nice, clean, sharp 
square wave with harmonics all the way up the spectrum. Paul, you did say 
"fast" right? ;)

Anyone know how to setup a zero-crossing gate? Am I making sense?

2cents
--mikes

RE: [motm] Clicking VCA

2005-04-07 by Paul Wagorn

This is a problem that has plagued me forever.  In fact, it's so bad, I
cannot use my motm for bass lines with a fast attack.   I suspect it has
more to do with vc leakage in the vca than anything else.  Putting the
filter after doesn't help because it's so strong.

 

There was a huge thread about this about a year ago.   My problem remains
unfixed, even after sending my vca to Paul

 

/paul

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Mike Estee [mailto:squeeker@...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:27 PM
To: Paul Schreiber
Cc: motm@yahoogroups.com; Jim Carlile
Subject: Re: [motm] Clicking VCA

 


On a related note (haha) this may be self evident, but I often put the VCA 
before the (LP) filter such that the harmonics from the severed bass wave 
gets filtered out. If I put it after the filter the VCA will cut those low 
notes off too quickly (or out of phase) creating a nice, clean, sharp 
square wave with harmonics all the way up the spectrum. Paul, you did say 
"fast" right? ;)

Anyone know how to setup a zero-crossing gate? Am I making sense?

2cents
--mikes



  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links

*	To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
  
*	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.

Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-07 by Jim Carlile

Yeah it is really disappointing.. PS said it was in the archives.. 
yeah its in the archives allright, but not a solution.  Are you using 
a 110 or a 190?  I thought I'd have no problems w/ the 190.. I took 
extreme care in assembling it and I'm confident I did a good job.  It 
is just very odd how only a few people seem to be having this 
problem.  I think I'll check around and see if a synthesizers.com VCA 
will solve my problem.  I could use that for my bass/fast attack 
patches and use the 190 for ring mod and control CV or slower attack 
stuff.  I don't see any other way around it, considering I've already 
invested enough in this modular project and a good VCA is a key 
component.
-Jim

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Wagorn" <pwagorn@p...> wrote:
This is a problem that has plagued me forever.  In fact, it's so bad, 
I cannot use my motm for bass lines with a fast attack.   I suspect 
it has more to do with vc leakage in the vca than anything else.  
Putting the filter after doesn't help because it's so strong. 

There was a huge thread about this about a year ago. My problem     
remains unfixed, even after sending my vca to Paul
/paul

[motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-07 by Scott Juskiw

>I think I'll check around and see if a synthesizers.com VCA
>will solve my problem.

This clicking issue is not unique to MOTM. I just did some tests 
using MOTM-110 VCAs and my own VCAs made from SSM chips and found no 
difference (I can make them both click with a fast EG attack time). I 
also tried using different envelope generators, MOTM-800, Encore UEG, 
and OMS-820 in EG mode coupled to MOTM-820. Again, no difference. All 
combinations of these EGs driving these VCAs produce identical 
results if the attack time is very short. I don't have any s*.com 
modules to try this with, but the results may not be any different.

Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by Paul Schreiber

(grits teeth):

a) there is NOTHING WRONG with the '190 VCA.

b) I've sold over 180 '190s, perhaps 4 people have said something.

c) I've looked at the outputs with my $10,000 digital scope looking for obvious 
'spikes' or DC shifts. Nope. I've run FFTs. I've duplicated "clicking" by 
hand-editing waveforms in SoundForge and playing them back on crappy PC 
speakers. The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s.

d) What you may want to try is increasing C9 on the '800 to like 10uf non-polar. 
This will increase the overall ADR times, and you may find that on the lower end 
of the scale (from 0 to 2) it's easier to find an Attack time that is more 
'forgiving'.

e) you may find that Sines and Triangle will 'click less' than pulses or saws.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by Jay

Scott Juskiw wrote:

> This clicking issue is not unique to MOTM.

Nope. Transients are transients. My DotCom, Blacet, and Voyager 
envelopes/VCA's can be set to be annoyingly clicky too.

But the thing is that they're pretty predictable in their output, not 
like the sound file Paul W. posted.

RE: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by Paul Wagorn

It's not the 800 envelope generator, it's the VCA.  We've been through this
many times.  (now *I* am gritting my teeth)

 

I have a ton of other vca's that do not exhibit the same behaviour (Doepfer,
moog, etc).  of course they will 'click' at superfast attacks & low freq
waveforms, but nothing like the MOTM vca.   

 

If you remember Paul, the problem was never solved.  $10,000 scope or not.  

"The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s."   buloney. Play the
file I sent you a year ago.

 

paul

 

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:19 PM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com; Jim Carlile
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

 

(grits teeth):

a) there is NOTHING WRONG with the '190 VCA.

b) I've sold over 180 '190s, perhaps 4 people have said something.

c) I've looked at the outputs with my $10,000 digital scope looking for
obvious 
'spikes' or DC shifts. Nope. I've run FFTs. I've duplicated "clicking" by 
hand-editing waveforms in SoundForge and playing them back on crappy PC 
speakers. The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s.

d) What you may want to try is increasing C9 on the '800 to like 10uf
non-polar. 
This will increase the overall ADR times, and you may find that on the lower
end 
of the scale (from 0 to 2) it's easier to find an Attack time that is more 
'forgiving'.

e) you may find that Sines and Triangle will 'click less' than pulses or
saws.

Paul S.




  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links

*	To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
  
*	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.

Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by Michael

My 190 doesn't click, at least not anymore than my SH-2 does. or any 
other synth I own. I'm running through a Soundcraft Spirit board into 
Mackie monitors. It's certainly not anything that's making bass 
sounds difficult, if I'm using really low freq I just move the attack 
up just slightly on the 800 and the click ceases completely and I get 
really snappy smooth bass.

- Michael nil-x
- Pressure : Penetration

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Wagorn" <pwagorn@p...> wrote:
> It's not the 800 envelope generator, it's the VCA.  We've been 
through this
> many times.  (now *I* am gritting my teeth)
> 
>  
> 
> I have a ton of other vca's that do not exhibit the same behaviour 
(Doepfer,
> moog, etc).  of course they will 'click' at superfast attacks & low 
freq
> waveforms, but nothing like the MOTM vca.   
> 
>  
> 
> If you remember Paul, the problem was never solved.  $10,000 scope 
or not.  
> 
> "The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s."   buloney. 
Play the
> file I sent you a year ago.
> 
>  
> 
> paul
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@a...] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:19 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com; Jim Carlile
> Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA
> 
>  
> 
> (grits teeth):
> 
> a) there is NOTHING WRONG with the '190 VCA.
> 
> b) I've sold over 180 '190s, perhaps 4 people have said something.
> 
> c) I've looked at the outputs with my $10,000 digital scope looking 
for
> obvious 
> 'spikes' or DC shifts. Nope. I've run FFTs. I've 
duplicated "clicking" by 
> hand-editing waveforms in SoundForge and playing them back on 
crappy PC 
> speakers. The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s.
> 
> d) What you may want to try is increasing C9 on the '800 to like 
10uf
> non-polar. 
> This will increase the overall ADR times, and you may find that on 
the lower
> end 
> of the scale (from 0 to 2) it's easier to find an Attack time that 
is more 
> 'forgiving'.
> 
> e) you may find that Sines and Triangle will 'click less' than 
pulses or
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> saws.
> 
> Paul S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> *	To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>   
> *	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
>   
> *	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.

RE: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by Paul Wagorn

Mine is a 110.

 

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Michael [mailto:mmanard@...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:31 PM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

 


My 190 doesn't click, at least not anymore than my SH-2 does. or any 
other synth I own. I'm running through a Soundcraft Spirit board into 
Mackie monitors. It's certainly not anything that's making bass 
sounds difficult, if I'm using really low freq I just move the attack 
up just slightly on the 800 and the click ceases completely and I get 
really snappy smooth bass.

- Michael nil-x
- Pressure : Penetration

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Wagorn" <pwagorn@p...> wrote:
> It's not the 800 envelope generator, it's the VCA.  We've been 
through this
> many times.  (now *I* am gritting my teeth)
> 
>  
> 
> I have a ton of other vca's that do not exhibit the same behaviour 
(Doepfer,
> moog, etc).  of course they will 'click' at superfast attacks & low 
freq
> waveforms, but nothing like the MOTM vca.   
> 
>  
> 
> If you remember Paul, the problem was never solved.  $10,000 scope 
or not.  
> 
> "The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s."   buloney. 
Play the
> file I sent you a year ago.
> 
>  
> 
> paul
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@a...] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:19 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com; Jim Carlile
> Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA
> 
>  
> 
> (grits teeth):
> 
> a) there is NOTHING WRONG with the '190 VCA.
> 
> b) I've sold over 180 '190s, perhaps 4 people have said something.
> 
> c) I've looked at the outputs with my $10,000 digital scope looking 
for
> obvious 
> 'spikes' or DC shifts. Nope. I've run FFTs. I've 
duplicated "clicking" by 
> hand-editing waveforms in SoundForge and playing them back on 
crappy PC 
> speakers. The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s.
> 
> d) What you may want to try is increasing C9 on the '800 to like 
10uf
> non-polar. 
> This will increase the overall ADR times, and you may find that on 
the lower
> end 
> of the scale (from 0 to 2) it's easier to find an Attack time that 
is more 
> 'forgiving'.
> 
> e) you may find that Sines and Triangle will 'click less' than 
pulses or
> saws.
> 
> Paul S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> *      To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
>   
> *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
>   
> *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.






  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links

*	To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
  
*	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.

RE: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by John Loffink

Can you post a short wave file (not mp3!) which captures and exhibits the
click?  

 

John Loffink

The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site

http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com

The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site

http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wagorn [mailto:pwagorn@...] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:35 PM
To: 'Michael'; motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

 

Mine is a 110.

Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by jhaible@debitel.net

Just a few thoughts:

As several people have statet, there is nothing such as
applying fast envelopes to a signal without any click. 
You will get this with an ideal VCA, and with ideal 
conditions - it's a law of nature.
It's most prominent when you're gating a signal with low
frequency, and low harmonic contents.

You can reduce this by choosing a slightly slower attack
time. Some VCAs are "cheating", as they apply a little bit
of filtering to the CV input. Thus, even when you apply 
an ultra-fast Attack on the CV input, the actual VCA core
doesn't see this fast Attack anymore. This is certainly
a constraint. The 190 doesn't have this - you choose the
attack time, and this is fed to the VCA core. If you want
a click, you get it (Hammond anybody?). If you don't want
it, set the attack slightly slower. That's what some other
VCAs do internally, without telling you.

To give you an extreme example: I've built this PS-3200
clone some time ago. There, both the VCF and the VCA have
a terrible amount of CV feedthru (or internal DC offset).
Consequently, the ADSR voltage is smoothed/filtered with a 
rather high time constant. Obviously, in a 48-voice polyphonic
monster, you can't make this parametric. It's a choice of
one capacitor value, one fixed CV slew rate. As you now
have two time constants (one in the ADSR, one in the VCA),
this even results in what I'd call a "two pole attack",
giving that trademark Polykorg sound. It's foolproof
and rather click-free, too. But you certainly don't want to
have such a fixed configuration in a modular synth, where
you want the widest range of sounds.
To emulate this effect, you can always run the ADSR thru
a VCLAG and experiment with various (low) settings.
If you want a cheap way to emulate this, make a special cable
with a 5.1k series resistor and a 220nF shunt capacitor in
the plug that goes to the VCA input. (Values just out of
my head - experiment!)
But all this are just some hints for getting an "extra".
The 190 VCA is pretty much an "ideal VCA", just as it is.


In addition to that, *excessive* clicks will occur when you
have a DC component at the input which is high compared to
your audio input. Again, this is a law of nature.
And again, you will find VCAs that strip off any DC component
off the input signal by AC coupling. 
The obvious downside is that with such a VCA, you cannot process
"slow" signals, like scaling CVs with controillers, etc.
DC in the audio signal isn't always a bad thing either:
AFAIK the ARP 2600 had 50% DC offset on some VCO outputs,
and DC-coupled VCAs. That was part of its sound.


If you have annoying clicks that change over time, you may
have a strong subsonic component in your input signal.


If you have a DC offset of, say, some Millivolts, on 
the input of an "ideal" VCA, the clicks will obviously become
(relatively) louder when you have a low input signal level.
So it's a good thing to carefully choose the input level
of a VCA. On "cheap" VCAs you are forced to do this anyway,
in order to avoid drowning in noise. A VCA that is closer to 
ideal is more forgiving in that respect, tempting to work with
lower input signals, or not to care much about input level
in general. And this is fine as long as you don't have a DC
component.

If you are determined to work with low level signal sources
that have a high DC offset, you can do some external AC coupling.
Make a cable with a 4.7uF non-poarized capacitor instead of
a straight connection. Do *not* use an electrolytic here.
Again, this is not a fix for the VCA, but for the signal source.

I hope this is of some help,

JH.


 



> My 190 doesn't click, at least not anymore than my SH-2 does. or any 
> other synth I own. I'm running through a Soundcraft Spirit board into 
> Mackie monitors. It's certainly not anything that's making bass 
> sounds difficult, if I'm using really low freq I just move the attack 
> up just slightly on the 800 and the click ceases completely and I get 
> really snappy smooth bass.
> 
> - Michael nil-x
> - Pressure : Penetration
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Wagorn" <pwagorn@p...> wrote:
> > It's not the 800 envelope generator, it's the VCA.  We've been 
> through this
> > many times.  (now *I* am gritting my teeth)
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I have a ton of other vca's that do not exhibit the same behaviour 
> (Doepfer,
> > moog, etc).  of course they will 'click' at superfast attacks & low 
> freq
> > waveforms, but nothing like the MOTM vca.   
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > If you remember Paul, the problem was never solved.  $10,000 scope 
> or not.  
> > 
> > "The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s."   buloney. 
> Play the
> > file I sent you a year ago.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > paul
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@a...] 
> > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 5:19 PM
> > To: motm@yahoogroups.com; Jim Carlile
> > Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > (grits teeth):
> > 
> > a) there is NOTHING WRONG with the '190 VCA.
> > 
> > b) I've sold over 180 '190s, perhaps 4 people have said something.
> > 
> > c) I've looked at the outputs with my $10,000 digital scope looking 
> for
> > obvious 
> > 'spikes' or DC shifts. Nope. I've run FFTs. I've 
> duplicated "clicking" by 
> > hand-editing waveforms in SoundForge and playing them back on 
> crappy PC 
> > speakers. The *same file* makes *no clicks* on my Event 20/20s.
> > 
> > d) What you may want to try is increasing C9 on the '800 to like 
> 10uf
> > non-polar. 
> > This will increase the overall ADR times, and you may find that on 
> the lower
> > end 
> > of the scale (from 0 to 2) it's easier to find an Attack time that 
> is more 
> > 'forgiving'.
> > 
> > e) you may find that Sines and Triangle will 'click less' than 
> pulses or
> > saws.
> > 
> > Paul S.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > *	To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
> >   
> > *	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
> >   
> > *	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




-------------------------------------------------
debitel.net Webmail

Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by paulhaneberg

Now I'm going to grit my teeth and contribute my two cents worth.

Paul S. is 100% correct in his evaluation of why this clicking occurs. 
I spend countless hours editing sound files in ProTools and I can tell 
you for a fact that anytime you cut a waveform it will click unless 
the cut occors at the zero crossing.  This is because the edit (which 
acts exactly as a fast envelope generator drivin a VCA) causes the 
waveform to change value instantaneously (or nearly so.)  If you 
looked at a frequency plot of the result you would see a noise spike 
or a click.  

There are two ways around this in ProTools.  Either you make a fade 
instead of a cut (which is the same thing as lengthening the attack 
and decay time on an EG)  or you make sure the cut is at a zero 
crossing.  The lower the frequency, the more you may have to shift the 
edit point to hit the zero crossing.  This tends to cause the edit to 
be either early or late.

It may be possible to build an EG that delays it attack until the 
incoming waveform crosses zero, especially if the attack is set very 
short.  It is also possible that if you were using a DCO instead of a 
VCO, you could cause the DCO to start its waveform at the leading edge 
of a gate signal.  Digital synths may in fact do this.

I have owned quite a large number of analog synths over the years and 
they have all clicked with too fast of an attack on low notes.  I 
can't say that my MOTM clicks any worse than any other synth under 
those conditions and I do have both 190 and 110 VCAs.  I have never 
found the clicking that does occor to be objectionable anyway.

I would also agree that the speakers may be part of the problem.  A 
speaker cone cannot move instantaneously, (I believe for it to do so 
would require infinite energy.)  When a speaker cone tries to move 
faster than it is capable of moving, all sorts of weird transients can 
result.  This problem may disappear when using a sub, as the subs 
frequency response is severely limited and the transients may be 
stopped by the crossover.  The crossover may also cause enough phase 
shift at the transition point to spread out the transient in the 
tweeters making it less objectionable.

To expect the VCA/EG combination not to click at low frequencies under 
fast transients, without implementing some kind of comsensation 
strategy is to expect Paul S. to violate the laws of physics.

Paul H.

RE: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

2005-04-08 by Paul Wagorn

I am confused as to how you can tell me why my clicking occurs when you
haven't bothered to speak with me, not listen to the sound file.  "100%
cetertain"  gezz.

 

It's VC leak.  If you have a low freq signal & chop it off, of course it
will click.  That's not what I'm talking about.

 

Listen to the sound file & look at it, and then tell me you're 100% certain.

 

Sheesh.

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: paulhaneberg [mailto:phaneber@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:55 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] Re: Clicking VCA

 


Now I'm going to grit my teeth and contribute my two cents worth.

Paul S. is 100% correct in his evaluation of why this clicking occurs. 
I spend countless hours editing sound files in ProTools and I can tell 
you for a fact that anytime you cut a waveform it will click unless 
the cut occors at the zero crossing.  This is because the edit (which 
acts exactly as a fast envelope generator drivin a VCA) causes the 
waveform to change value instantaneously (or nearly so.)  If you 
looked at a frequency plot of the result you would see a noise spike 
or a click.  

There are two ways around this in ProTools.  Either you make a fade 
instead of a cut (which is the same thing as lengthening the attack 
and decay time on an EG)  or you make sure the cut is at a zero 
crossing.  The lower the frequency, the more you may have to shift the 
edit point to hit the zero crossing.  This tends to cause the edit to 
be either early or late.

It may be possible to build an EG that delays it attack until the 
incoming waveform crosses zero, especially if the attack is set very 
short.  It is also possible that if you were using a DCO instead of a 
VCO, you could cause the DCO to start its waveform at the leading edge 
of a gate signal.  Digital synths may in fact do this.

I have owned quite a large number of analog synths over the years and 
they have all clicked with too fast of an attack on low notes.  I 
can't say that my MOTM clicks any worse than any other synth under 
those conditions and I do have both 190 and 110 VCAs.  I have never 
found the clicking that does occor to be objectionable anyway.

I would also agree that the speakers may be part of the problem.  A 
speaker cone cannot move instantaneously, (I believe for it to do so 
would require infinite energy.)  When a speaker cone tries to move 
faster than it is capable of moving, all sorts of weird transients can 
result.  This problem may disappear when using a sub, as the subs 
frequency response is severely limited and the transients may be 
stopped by the crossover.  The crossover may also cause enough phase 
shift at the transition point to spread out the transient in the 
tweeters making it less objectionable.

To expect the VCA/EG combination not to click at low frequencies under 
fast transients, without implementing some kind of comsensation 
strategy is to expect Paul S. to violate the laws of physics.

Paul H.








  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links

*	To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/motm/
  
*	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.