Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Need 2 beta testers

Need 2 beta testers

2005-03-04 by Paul Schreiber

I need 2 beta testers for the VC Pulse Divider prototype. Here are the 
*requirements* :

a) have a MOTM-950 supply or have one on order (which means I'll bill you and 
send it with the proto). OR...place an order for one :)

b) the prototype is *not* a 'module'. It is a pcb about 8 x 10 inches. It needs 
to lie flat on a surface (not dangling in space) within 24in of the MOTM-950. 
The jacks are pcb mounted along the 'edges' of the board. There are some 
switches and pots also soldered on the board.

c) Although you can run audio through it (up to about 14Khz) that's not the 
*primary* use. It's a "clocking" module that sits in-between say a LFO and a 
sequencer. The input can be any thru-zero wave, but the outputs of the divider 
are (currently) 50% duty cycle square waves of about 0 to +4V. I need testers 
that have 'things' with external clock inputs.

d) there is a 'stepped' CV output that is set for 4ths/octaves/5ths that you can 
drive VCOs, VCFs, etc with. Fixed at 8 steps, but driven by either the input 
clock or the /N clock (switch selected).

e) you HAVE to mess with it for some decent time by April 1st. And I don't mean 
"Oh Sh-t, Paul is going to call me tomorrow! I'd better *find* it!".


So, if you qualify please send me a *PRIVATE* email.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] Need 2 beta testers

2005-03-04 by Wood

I Wish!
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
To: "MOTM litserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:27 AM
Subject: [motm] Need 2 beta testers


> 
> I need 2 beta testers for the VC Pulse Divider prototype. Here are the 
> *requirements* :
> 
> a) have a MOTM-950 supply or have one on order (which means I'll bill you and 
> send it with the proto). OR...place an order for one :)
> 
> b) the prototype is *not* a 'module'. It is a pcb about 8 x 10 inches. It needs 
> to lie flat on a surface (not dangling in space) within 24in of the MOTM-950. 
> The jacks are pcb mounted along the 'edges' of the board. There are some 
> switches and pots also soldered on the board.
> 
> c) Although you can run audio through it (up to about 14Khz) that's not the 
> *primary* use. It's a "clocking" module that sits in-between say a LFO and a 
> sequencer. The input can be any thru-zero wave, but the outputs of the divider 
> are (currently) 50% duty cycle square waves of about 0 to +4V. I need testers 
> that have 'things' with external clock inputs.
> 
> d) there is a 'stepped' CV output that is set for 4ths/octaves/5ths that you can 
> drive VCOs, VCFs, etc with. Fixed at 8 steps, but driven by either the input 
> clock or the /N clock (switch selected).
> 
> e) you HAVE to mess with it for some decent time by April 1st. And I don't mean 
> "Oh Sh-t, Paul is going to call me tomorrow! I'd better *find* it!".
> 
> 
> So, if you qualify please send me a *PRIVATE* email.
> 
> Paul S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 3/2/2005
> 
> 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 3/2/2005

building the 480

2005-03-05 by Scott Juskiw

I'm building my 480s tonight and can't find any mention of Q3-Q6 in 
the instructions. Obviously, they go into the board, but is it 
recommended to have them thermo-coupled as Stooge Larry mentioned in 
a previous email?

Also, I'm wondering what other people think about these pre-populated 
boards. It sure saves time getting all the resistors and most of the 
caps installed. But it also seems a bit like having your food 
pre-chewed. Mmmmmm, baby food. I had a couple of resistors come lose 
along the way, so check your ziploc bags before you stuff your lunch 
into them.

RE: [motm] building the 480

2005-03-05 by John Loffink

Yes, add the thermal compound between each pair of transistors.

John Loffink
The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Juskiw [mailto:scott@...]
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 9:38 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [motm] building the 480
> 
> 
> I'm building my 480s tonight and can't find any mention of Q3-Q6 in
> the instructions. Obviously, they go into the board, but is it
> recommended to have them thermo-coupled as Stooge Larry mentioned in
> a previous email?
> 
> Also, I'm wondering what other people think about these pre-populated
> boards. It sure saves time getting all the resistors and most of the
> caps installed. But it also seems a bit like having your food
> pre-chewed. Mmmmmm, baby food. I had a couple of resistors come lose
> along the way, so check your ziploc bags before you stuff your lunch
> into them.
> 
>

Re: [motm] building the 480

2005-03-05 by Scott E.

Scott

I'm with you on this. The time saving is OK, but I enjoy board stuffing. 
It is half the fun of building the kit and I find it relaxing therapy.

Scott Evans
===============================================
Scott Juskiw wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Also, I'm wondering what other people think about these pre-populated
> boards. It sure saves time getting all the resistors and most of the
> caps installed. But it also seems a bit like having your food
> pre-chewed. Mmmmmm, baby food. I had a couple of resistors come lose
> along the way, so check your ziploc bags before you stuff your lunch
> into them.
>

Re: building the 480

2005-03-05 by Jeffrey Pontius

> Also, I'm wondering what other people think about these pre-populated
> boards.
Actually, I like the prepopulated boards.  Yes, I enjoy putting together
the module kits, but populating and soldering the resistors (and the
decoupling caps) has always  been my 'least favorite' (to put it
mildly) part of building a module.  I vote for more prepopulated boards.

Jeff

Re: building the 480

2005-03-05 by allanjhall

> > Also, I'm wondering what other people think about these pre-
populated
> > boards.

I'm definately in favour of pre-populated, anything that reduces the 
risk of wrongly placing a component is good news to me.

> I'm with you on this. The time saving is OK, but I enjoy board 
stuffing. 

Hey, if you really enjoy placing the resistors and caps you could  
take them all out, mix them all up then place them back in again ;-)

Allan

RE: [motm] Re: building the 480

2005-03-05 by Adam Schabtach

> Actually, I like the prepopulated boards.  Yes, I enjoy putting together
> the module kits, but populating and soldering the resistors (and the
> decoupling caps) has always  been my 'least favorite' (to put it
> mildly) part of building a module.  I vote for more prepopulated boards.

Amusingly enough, my preferences are opposite: I think stuffing boards is
more fun than the mechanical assembly and running the board-to-panel wires.
That said, the presence or absence of a pre-stuffed board has little to do
with my purchasing decisions.

--Adam

Re: [motm] building the 480

2005-03-07 by Mike Estee

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Scott Juskiw wrote:

> Also, I'm wondering what other people think about these pre-populated
> boards. It sure saves time getting all the resistors and most of the
> caps installed. But it also seems a bit like having your food
> pre-chewed. Mmmmmm, baby food. I had a couple of resistors come lose

I think it's a great idea. Personally, building the modules is a distant 
second to using them. I'd happily buy all my boards pre-stuffed. If I 
could afford it I'd buy them already assembled, but I can't so I build 
every one. The point (for me anyway) is to make music, not inhale a lot of 
solder. I get my soldering kicks with my own personal projects.

--mikes

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.