Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

MOTM-292 mockup?

MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-11 by Paul Schreiber

All you Photoshop geniuses see if a dual, triple, or Quad LPG makes sense. Having the CV jacks in
a vertical column on the far left seems asking for trouble unless it's over in the "2nd" jack
column.

Paul S.

RE: [motm] MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-11 by John Loffink

First we need to know what jacks and pots we need for those special MOTM
only features.

John Loffink
jloffink@... 

The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com/

The Wavemakers Modular and Integrated Synthesizer Web Site
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/

> 
> All you Photoshop geniuses see if a dual, triple, or Quad LPG makes
sense.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Having the CV jacks in
> a vertical column on the far left seems asking for trouble unless it's
> over in the "2nd" jack
> column.
> 
> Paul S.
>

Re: MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-11 by Mike Marsh

Does that mean GAIN pot, CV IN, IN, and OUT?  Plus LED?  You could 
fit two of those in a 1U.

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> Start with the basic setup, let's start there.
> 
> Paul S.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Loffink" <jloffink@a...>
> To: "'Paul Schreiber'" <synth1@a...>; "'MOTM listserv'" 
<motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:16 PM
> Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM-292 mockup?
> 
> 
> > First we need to know what jacks and pots we need for those 
special MOTM
> > only features.
> > 
> > John Loffink
> > jloffink@a... 
> > 
> > The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
> > http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com/
> > 
> > The Wavemakers Modular and Integrated Synthesizer Web Site
> > http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/
> > 
> > > 
> > > All you Photoshop geniuses see if a dual, triple, or Quad LPG 
makes
> > sense.
> > > Having the CV jacks in
> > > a vertical column on the far left seems asking for trouble 
unless it's
> > > over in the "2nd" jack
> > > column.
> > > 
> > > Paul S.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > 
> >

Re: [motm] MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-11 by Paul Schreiber

Start with the basic setup, let's start there.

Paul S.

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "John Loffink" <jloffink@...>
To: "'Paul Schreiber'" <synth1@...>; "'MOTM listserv'" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM-292 mockup?


> First we need to know what jacks and pots we need for those special MOTM
> only features.
> 
> John Loffink
> jloffink@... 
> 
> The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
> http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com/
> 
> The Wavemakers Modular and Integrated Synthesizer Web Site
> http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/
> 
> > 
> > All you Photoshop geniuses see if a dual, triple, or Quad LPG makes
> sense.
> > Having the CV jacks in
> > a vertical column on the far left seems asking for trouble unless it's
> > over in the "2nd" jack
> > column.
> > 
> > Paul S.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>

Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-12 by Paul Schreiber

Add a CV Mod pot per channel, and GAIN is not exactly "correct" INITIAL is better.

Paul S.

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: MOTM-292 mockup?


> Does that mean GAIN pot, CV IN, IN, and OUT?  Plus LED?  You could 
> fit two of those in a 1U.
> 
> Mike
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> > Start with the basic setup, let's start there.
> > 
> > Paul S.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John Loffink" <jloffink@a...>
> > To: "'Paul Schreiber'" <synth1@a...>; "'MOTM listserv'" 
> <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:16 PM
> > Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM-292 mockup?
> > 
> > 
> > > First we need to know what jacks and pots we need for those 
> special MOTM
> > > only features.
> > > 
> > > John Loffink
> > > jloffink@a... 
> > > 
> > > The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
> > > http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com/
> > > 
> > > The Wavemakers Modular and Integrated Synthesizer Web Site
> > > http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > All you Photoshop geniuses see if a dual, triple, or Quad LPG 
> makes
> > > sense.
> > > > Having the CV jacks in
> > > > a vertical column on the far left seems asking for trouble 
> unless it's
> > > > over in the "2nd" jack
> > > > column.
> > > > 
> > > > Paul S.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > > 
> > >
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
>

Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-12 by Mark

On 6/11/03, Paul Schreiber put forth:
>
>Add a CV Mod pot per channel, and GAIN is not exactly "correct"
>INITIAL is better.

If you add a CV mod pot (two pots and three jacks per LPG), then two
LPG's would not fit on 1U.

If you decide on a 2U dual unit and add another jack and another knob
per channel to add new features and fill up the panel, then you might
as well make a 1U single LPG.   No matter how you configure two LPG's
in a dual unit, if each channel has the same amount of features, then
result is always divisible by two :)

Especailly considering that competing manufacturers offer LPG's, adding
extra features seems important.  Also, didn't the 292 have a
"amplitude-both-frequency" switch for each channel??  That's a
feature that might be worth keeping.

Since most folks don't know what a LPG does, I think 1U module would
sell better than a 2U module -- it would be less of risk.  Anyone who
wants more LPG's could just buy more modules :)

Re: MOTM-292 mockup?

2003-06-12 by Mike Marsh

It *might* fit if you use smaller pots for the CV and a smaller knob 
and you scrunched up the jacks a little.  Maybe even used smaller 
LEDs.

BTW, the Cyndustries version also has the Amp-Both-Freq feature.

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Mark <yahoogroups@p...> wrote:
> On 6/11/03, Paul Schreiber put forth:
> >
> >Add a CV Mod pot per channel, and GAIN is not exactly "correct"
> >INITIAL is better.
> 
> If you add a CV mod pot (two pots and three jacks per LPG), then 
two
> LPG's would not fit on 1U.
> 
> If you decide on a 2U dual unit and add another jack and another 
knob
> per channel to add new features and fill up the panel, then you 
might
> as well make a 1U single LPG.   No matter how you configure two 
LPG's
> in a dual unit, if each channel has the same amount of features, 
then
> result is always divisible by two :)
> 
> Especailly considering that competing manufacturers offer LPG's, 
adding
> extra features seems important.  Also, didn't the 292 have a
> "amplitude-both-frequency" switch for each channel??  That's a
> feature that might be worth keeping.
> 
> Since most folks don't know what a LPG does, I think 1U module 
would
> sell better than a 2U module -- it would be less of risk.  Anyone 
who
> wants more LPG's could just buy more modules :)

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.