Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

190

190

2003-04-13 by Mike Marsh

Just built it.  Much fun.  Blend, exponential, 1U!

Mike

Re: 190

2003-04-13 by osthelder

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@w...> wrote:
> Just built it.  Much fun.  Blend, exponential, 1U!
> 
> Mike

Mike's right people!  I've got three of these beauties and they are
capable of true modulatory mayhem.  Compact, powerful and, best of
all, MOTM quality!

Chub

Re: 190

2003-04-13 by Mike Marsh

I sent Paul a demo last night and he says it sounds like a CS-80.  
It really is fun!

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "osthelder" <osthelder@n...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@w...> wrote:
> > Just built it.  Much fun.  Blend, exponential, 1U!
> > 
> > Mike
> 
> Mike's right people!  I've got three of these beauties and they are
> capable of true modulatory mayhem.  Compact, powerful and, best of
> all, MOTM quality!
> 
> Chub

Re: [motm] Re: 190

2003-04-14 by jhaible

> I sent Paul a demo last night and he says it sounds like a CS-80.
> It really is fun!

It was the CS-80's ring mod which I had in mind when I designed
it. (;->)

I think the MOTM style potentiometers with their low mechanical
resistance are the second best solution after the CS- synth's "quadrant"
sliders. Imagine you'd have to to do a quick manual crossfade between
Clean and RM on a stiff potentiometer - no way.

JH.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.