Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:28 UTC

Thread

Fw: Update

Fw: Update

2003-03-02 by Paul Schreiber

I'm sorry if you see this twice. I have no verification it went out the first time.



> Now that the ice has melted, and all of our cars are caked with salt and sand, I can drive to
the
> post office and actually *ship* stuff next week. And trust me, I know *exactly* how far behind
I
> am. I just spent 1 hour updating the backlog and planning the building/kitting/parts ordering
> schedule for the next 10 WEEKS.
>
> Assembled backlog (not counting 500/600 series)
>
> Has reached an all time high! Which is great because Feb. is the traditional slow month here
> (folks paying off the last of the Christmas debts and waiting for tax refunds). I shipped 61
> assembled modules in Dec/Jan/Feb with NAMM sucking up 6 weeks of that period. Most of the
backlog
> is from *new* customers, one all the way from Russia! The majority of the backlog is '190s,
'300s
> and '800s. I'll be soldering the entire week of March 10th. Right now I'm working on a batch of
> 440s.
>
> Kit backlog (not counting 500/600 series)
>
> I have stocked completely the '190, '490, '310 and '830. Starting Monday on 48 kits of the '800
> followed by 36 kits of the '300. Looking over the current backlog, I should be able to ship
over
> 125 kits out next week! I also made up some '940s, so some of you waiting on those will see
them.
> I am out of '910s, and it will take until around March 21st to get more back in stock (built by
> outside shop). I do now have *plenty* of '960s and '990s. I have all of the parts in for the
'950
> *except* the new wire set, which gets ordered on Monday.
>
> 500/600 series
>
> The current guesstimate on these things shipping are as follows:
>
> WaveWarper - mid April. I need to implement the last pcb tweak and get the rotary switches
made.
> The good news is that the Spectrol 100 ohm pots (for the 'Warp Factor' control) arrived Friday.
> I'm not the only slow company around: these were ordered Oct. 11th :)
>
> Fixed Filter bank - early May. The design is done, I'm going to order the front panels in about
2
> weeks. The pcb design needs to be completed (going from 1 large pcb to two small ones) with the
> expansion connector added. Several beta testers have played with it, all give it a huge thumbs
> up.
>
> Cloud Generator - June. This is all my fault, I have to get off my butt and do the prototype
pcb
> so the firmware can get going. The week of March 24th is Cloud Off My Butt Week.
>
> uSeq - late April/early May. Needs 1 pcb revision, but the hardware is solid. Front panels in
> stock. I'm ordering parts for 50 units next week. Right now, about 38 are on order. If you want
> to get in the first run, now the time to order. I can't keep much inventory due to the high $$$
> cost and the fact the parts cannot be used by other modules (like say TL072 op amps can be).
>
> MIDI/CV - May. Atmel (the uP vendor) shafted us in late Dec. and we now have to add a small PIC
> uP to assist in the SPI I/O hardware. Nothing much we can do here as about 2 months prior HW/SW
> went bye-bye.
>
> Also: the MOTM-480 will *finally* see the light of day in late May as well. I can't schedule
time
> to do the pcb layout until April. I do have 95% of the parts for it, including front panels.
>
> Well, that's the 'bad' news. MOTM is still growing despite war gloom and a down economy.
Without
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> MOTM, I'd be in a *serious* panic myself, as the EE job market is ZERO where I live, with no
> signs of any recovery of any sort until 2004. At least the current backlog will keep me busy
> until June/July. After that, I guess JH, Crow and I will have to cook up some new stuff for the
> remainder of the year. SEM filter, anybody? :)
>
> Paul S.
>

Re: [motm] Fw: Update

2003-03-03 by Scott Juskiw

At 1:01 AM -0600 2003/03/02, Paul Schreiber wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>After that, I guess JH, Crow and I will have to cook up some new stuff for the
> > remainder of the year. SEM filter, anybody? :)

SEM sounds good to me. Then there's all this other stuff that has
been mentioned in the past (digging through the archives):

Dual VCA (130)
Triple Preamp
Envelope Follower
VC Pulse Divider
VC Envelope Generator (880)
JH interpolating scanner
JH-5 style dual LPF

and the remaining 500 series (envelope nest, munging decimator) which
are no longer mentioned on the website.

Any thoughts on when these piggies get to market?

Re: [motm] Fw: Update

2003-03-03 by Paul Schreiber

I've only scheduled out until July. What does out this fall is up for YOU all to decide. So,
given Scott's list, or any OTHER modules you want to see, rank the top 6 (6 is about all I can
handle, because evil NAMM lurks).

Paul S.



Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Dual VCA (130)
> Triple Preamp
> Envelope Follower
> VC Pulse Divider
> VC Envelope Generator (880)
> JH interpolating scanner
> JH-5 style dual LPF
>
> and the remaining 500 series (envelope nest, munging decimator) which
> are no longer mentioned on the website.
>
> Any thoughts on when these piggies get to market?
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [motm] Fw: Update

2003-03-03 by J. Larry Hendry

All on my "must have" list.
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Juskiw <scott@...>
Triple Preamp
Envelope Follower
VC Pulse Divider
VC Envelope Generator (880)
JH interpolating scanner
JH-5 style dual LPF

update: module ranking

2003-03-03 by Jeffrey Pontius

#1--------------> DUAL VCA PAN/FADE <---------#1
#2: envelope nest thing
#3: vc envelope
#4: vc pulse divider

Re: [motm] update: module ranking

2003-03-03 by Sikorsky

#1--------------> DUAL VCA PAN/FADE <---------#1

absolutely my number one, i'd have a pair of these permanently wired into my
console

as for the other stuff, i have no great preference, except maybe the triple
pre-amp should be no.2

cheers
paul b
sheffield / uk

Re: [motm] Fw: Update

2003-03-03 by Adam Schabtach

Could someone provide a brief explanation of these two hypothetical modules,
for those of us who haven't been around long enough to know what they are?

Show quoted textHide quoted text
> JH interpolating scanner
> JH-5 style dual LPF

I wish to cast my vote with intelligence. Yes, I could attempt to find this
information by digging through Yahoo's highly annoying archives, but I'm
lazy and often the precise nature of any give module is difficult to discern
from the archives anyway.

Thanks,
--Adam

Re: [motm] Fw: Update

2003-03-03 by groovyshaman@snet.net

Hi Adam. From the source:

JH-5 Dual LPF:
http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/jh5/jh5.html
JH Interpolating Scanner:
http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/tonline_stuff/jh_ipscan.html

Cheers,
George
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Adam Schabtach <adam@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] Fw: Update


> Could someone provide a brief explanation of these two hypothetical modules,
> for those of us who haven't been around long enough to know what they are?
>
> > JH interpolating scanner
> > JH-5 style dual LPF
>
> I wish to cast my vote with intelligence. Yes, I could attempt to find this
> information by digging through Yahoo's highly annoying archives, but I'm
> lazy and often the precise nature of any give module is difficult to discern
> from the archives anyway.
>
> Thanks,
> --Adam
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: Fw: Update

2003-03-03 by Scott Gibbons

Please:

VC Envelope Generator (880)
VC Envelope Generator (880)
VC Envelope Generator (880)
VC Envelope Generator (880)
VC Envelope Generator (880)
VC Envelope Generator (880)

God help me, I've actually been thinking about adding a Doepfer panel just
to have a CVEG ;-)

best,
- Scott
____________
http://www.red-noise.com
http://www.strawberryplanet.org

My ranking (FWIW)

2003-03-03 by Adam Schabtach

Okay, here's my vote, highest level of desire listed first:

JH-5 style dual LPF
Triple Preamp
VC Envelope Generator (880)
Envelope Follower
JH interpolating scanner
Dual VCA (130)


--Adam
(fond of filters)

Re: Update - Weird Module Ideas

2003-03-03 by elle_webb <elle_webb@hotmail.com>

Of the proposed modules, the dual vca would be the hottest, as long
as it will easily support voltage controlled panning.

Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > Dual VCA (130)
> > Triple Preamp
> > Envelope Follower
> > VC Pulse Divider
> > VC Envelope Generator (880)
> > JH interpolating scanner
> > JH-5 style dual LPF

Here are a few ideas that may be a little "out there":

Preset panel/wiring kit (The "spaghetti in your guts" module)
A simple panel and wiring kit that would support configuring 2 or 3
semi-permanent normalized presets. Switch it in, and it would make
the 5-10 connections inside your case for a basic patch. Switch it
out, and it does nothing.

Pro-One/MacBeth Kit
A kit for a complete basic lead synth similar to a Pro-One (without
the keyboard) or a MacBeth. Two basic VCOs, noise, a LFO, a VCF, a
VCA, two EG's, switches for selecting modulation routing, a basic
Midi converter, and jacks for the most commonly used cv modulators in
and out. 1 panel, 5U by 19". This could be used for live performance
and situations where you want MOTM quality, but also need rapid
switching of common modulations.

Quantizer - CV in, quantized cv out. It should support several
selectable equal tempered "quantizations" and just intonations, too.

Filter bank companion:
How about a companion module to the fixed filter bank that would take
an audio signal, split it into control signals based on the settings
of the filter bank, and use these control signals to modulate a
second audio signal. I'm not sure if this would make sense or not,
but it seems like there would be a lot of cool things one could do
with a modular approach to a vocoder.

Anything else weird on people's wish list?

RE: [motm] Re: Update - Weird Module Ideas

2003-03-03 by Frank Vanaman

Howdy all--

>-----Original Message-----
>From: elle_webb <elle_webb@...> [mailto:elle_webb@...]
>Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 5:56 PM
>
>Pro-One/MacBeth Kit
>A kit for a complete basic lead synth similar to a Pro-One (without
>the keyboard) or a MacBeth. Two basic VCOs, noise, a LFO, a VCF, a
>VCA, two EG's, switches for selecting modulation routing, a basic
>Midi converter, and jacks for the most commonly used cv modulators in
>and out. 1 panel, 5U by 19". This could be used for live performance
>and situations where you want MOTM quality, but also need rapid
>switching of common modulations.

Why not the JH-5?

http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/jh5/jh5.html

Well, actually I guess it lacks MIDI and noise, but otherwise, looks to be
pretty full-featured for 'that' particular sound.

We'd probably have a hard time getting Paul to allow different shaped knobs,
and a non'grid spacing for some controls, but that's a feature in this case
(i.e., an MOTM mono-synth) that might make for easy handling in real time...

Frank

Re: [motm] Re: Update - Weird Module Ideas

2003-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry

----- Original Message -----
From: <elle_webb@...>
Here are a few ideas that may be a little "out there":

Preset panel/wiring kit (The "spaghetti in your guts" module) A simple panel
and wiring kit that would support configuring 2 or 3 semi-permanent
normalized presets. Switch it in, and it would make the 5-10 connections
inside your case for a basic patch. Switch it out, and it does nothing.

--LH--
A while back, Paul talked about a possible module which might share some of
this functionality. He talked about a preset module with several voltage
outputs that could be remembered as part of a patch. I'm not sure how many
CV outs make sense. But, to me, this kind of module, coupled with some 700
switches and VC modules could be awesome. However, to run the real estate
down somewhat, I would think some switches built in would be a cool think
too.

Of course, this is all from gray matter long-term storage memory which is
not near as good as it used to be.
Larry

Re: Update - Weird Module Ideas

2003-03-04 by mate_stubb <mate_stubb@yahoo.com>

Layout for the MOTM-130 Dual VCA/Panner is here:

http://www.hotrodmotm.com/images/motm/m-130.jpg

It does fades as well as pans and can be cascaded. Disclaimer: I did
the panel layout awhile back under Paul's direction, but Paul is
under no obligation to keep it unchanged.

Moe
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "elle_webb <elle_webb@h...>"
<elle_webb@h...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Of the proposed modules, the dual vca would be the hottest, as long
> as it will easily support voltage controlled panning.
>

Re: [motm] Re: Update - Weird Module Ideas

2003-03-04 by Craig Critchley

Dammit, now you've got me all excited about the 130 again. I've been
looking forward to that since the 110 ran out, though the 190 helps a lot.

So with that, my list would start with,

'130 dual vca
envelope follower
preamp

Beyond that, the envelope nest sounds interesting, so do the VC envelope and
the pulse divider. I like filters, too, though...

...Craig

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: <mate_stubb@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:27 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: Update - Weird Module Ideas


> Layout for the MOTM-130 Dual VCA/Panner is here:
>
> http://www.hotrodmotm.com/images/motm/m-130.jpg
>
> It does fades as well as pans and can be cascaded. Disclaimer: I did
> the panel layout awhile back under Paul's direction, but Paul is
> under no obligation to keep it unchanged.
>
> Moe
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "elle_webb <elle_webb@h...>"
> <elle_webb@h...> wrote:
> > Of the proposed modules, the dual vca would be the hottest, as long
> > as it will easily support voltage controlled panning.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>