Nice PIC book
2003-02-27 by Paul Schreiber
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC
Thread
2003-02-27 by Paul Schreiber
Just received: "The Quintessential PIC" by Sid Katzen. ISBN 1-85233-309-X. www. springer-ny.com This is a *really* good book! It's actually explains HOW the insides work at a level not insulting to the average person. MANY code examples! Paul S.
2003-02-28 by Tentochi
I had a new MOTMer ask me last week about retired modules. So here is the very brief list (to the best of my knowledge): MOTM-100 NS/S&H * Replaced by the MOTM-101 * New functionality added! MOTM-110 VCA/RM * Replaced by MOTM-190 (and upcoming MOTM-130) * '110 utilized CEM 3330 Dual VCA chip * One of few socketed chips in MOTM line * New modules eliminate CEM 3330 reliance * New modules employ discreet circuitry I am not aware of any more that are currently on the hit list. --Shemp __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
2003-02-28 by Paul Schreiber
Nope, that's it. There is *always* a possibility of a pcb rev sneaking in. But nothing is *planned*. Paul S.
2003-02-28 by Tentochi
For those few of you who aren't familiar with the socketed vs. unsocketed issue.... Chips that are either expensive or hard to obtain go in sockets. This lessens the chance for damage during soldering. It also allows the chip to be placed on the board as the very last component. Chips that are cheap and/or readily available are directly soldered to the PCB. Skipping the sockets prevents the chips wiggling loose during transport (or earthquakes). It also eliminates any possibility of corrosion building up between the pins and the socket which can sometimes lead to an intermittent connections or no connection at all. Paul has done an excellent job of removing any dependence on dedicated ICs. The most popular of these, CEM and SSM, have not been manufactured in many years. This allows for this ever dwindling stockpile to be used for replacement parts in vintage synths. It allow makes MOTM easier and cheaper to repair with off-the-shelf components. Some might argue that it makes it more reliable too. A few current modular and synth designers (who will remain nameless here) have opted not to go this route and eat up the remaining known supplies of chips--unfortunate to say the least. Enough rambling for now. I hope this helps explain some things for people that are a bit newer here. --Shemp Coming up on my 4th anniversary!!!!! > MOTM-110 VCA/RM > * Replaced by MOTM-190 (and upcoming MOTM-130) > * '110 utilized CEM 3330 Dual VCA chip > * One of few socketed chips in MOTM line > * New modules eliminate CEM 3330 reliance > * New modules employ discreet circuitry __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
2003-02-28 by CHRIS PARKER
>>Paul Schreiber wrote: >>There is *always* a possibility of a pcb rev sneaking in. But nothing is *planned*. Isn't this what happened with the original version of the MOTM-800 Envelope Generator? We now have the "B" version of the circuit board that allows full ADSR operation with just a gate (no separate trigger pulse required). To Paul's credit, there was a lot of discussion on the list before this board revision was made. And as I recall, I believe that some of the list members had modification instructions at one time for converting the old 800 board to the new functionality. (As someone who owns 5 of the original MOTM-800 modules, I'd like to know if these modification instructions are still available anywhere.) Just another reason to buy MOTM quality! -Chris-
2003-02-28 by Scott Juskiw
At 6:23 AM -0800 2003/02/28, Tentochi wrote: >A few current modular and >synth designers (who will remain nameless here) have >opted not to go this route and eat up the remaining >known supplies of chips--unfortunate to say the least. I'm sure this wasn't aimed at me, but I wish to set the record straight. I am selling some modules that use CEM and SSM chips. But I'm only selling modules to use up chips that I already own, a dozen or so that I bought in 1985 that are just collecting dust on my work bench. All future modules from me will not be using any CEM or SSM chips.
2003-03-01 by J. Larry Hendry
I did all 6 of mine but never wrote instructions it was so simple. If you don't find the docs out there, I will pull one of mine out and document it. I need to pull mine out to do Moe Bradley's mods for LEDs anyhow. :) LH
----- Original Message ----- From: CHRIS PARKER <cparker@...> To Paul's credit, there was a lot of discussion on the list before this board revision was made. And as I recall, I believe that some of the list members had modification instructions at one time for converting the old 800 board to the new functionality. (As someone who owns 5 of the original MOTM-800 modules, I'd like to know if these modification instructions are still available anywhere.)
2003-03-01 by mate_stubb <mate_stubb@yahoo.com>
Looking at mine right now, it appears that the only mod is a jumper wire from R1 (the end closest to the jacks) to the normalling (top) lug of the TRIG jack. Moe --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@i...> wrote: > I did all 6 of mine but never wrote instructions it was so simple. If you > don't find the docs out there, I will pull one of mine out and document it.
> I need to pull mine out to do Moe Bradley's mods for LEDs anyhow. :) > LH >