Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 13:59 UTC

Thread

Re: [motm] Lord of the Ring Mod (was: more NAMM poop)

Re: [motm] Lord of the Ring Mod (was: more NAMM poop)

2002-01-18 by jhaible@debitel.net

> >Chris MacDonald is the guy that designed the MiniModular.
[...]
> Will it include schematics?? While I doubt anyone would try to steal an
> SMD design, the majority of MOTM builders are curious how things work.

I've seen the schematics. As I have some "web presence" with an analog
frequency shifter myself, Chris has contacted me and showed me the schematics.

It looks really good!
It's a solid analogue design, as far as I remember not aiming for thru-zero stuff,
but using a very good quadrature oscillator that can go down to low frequencies.

There's a lot of things that have an influence on the final quality of a FS, like
component tolerances and the precision of adjustments, and the pcb layout
of course. So you can only judge it when you have tried the real thing. But
as you have asked about the circuit - yes, it looks good.

Chris - if you read this - good luck for your FS !

JH.

Re: [motm] Lord of the Ring Mod (was: more NAMM poop)

2002-01-18 by Larry Hendry

--- jhaible@... wrote:
> > >Chris MacDonald is the guy that designed the MiniModular.
> [...]
> > Will it include schematics?? While I doubt anyone would try to
> steal an
> > SMD design, the majority of MOTM builders are curious how things
> work.
>
> I've seen the schematics. As I have some "web presence" with an
> analog
> frequency shifter myself, Chris has contacted me and showed me the
> schematics.
>
> It looks really good!
> It's a solid analogue design, as far as I remember not aiming for
> thru-zero stuff,
> but using a very good quadrature oscillator that can go down to low
> frequencies.
>
> There's a lot of things that have an influence on the final quality
> of a FS, like
> component tolerances and the precision of adjustments, and the pcb
> layout
> of course. So you can only judge it when you have tried the real
> thing. But
> as you have asked about the circuit - yes, it looks good.
>
> Chris - if you read this - good luck for your FS !
>
> JH.
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

mail server down and out

2002-01-18 by Larry Hendry

Apparently, my normal ISP (iquest) mail server is down. So, I have
not been getting mail at my normal address for some hours. Who knows
how long it will be down. Not too long I hope. But, I can be
reached at this address if you have sent me something and I failed to
respond.

Thanks,
Larry Hendry



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

Re: Re: [motm] Lord of the Ring Mod (was: more NAMM poop)

2002-01-19 by mark@indole.net

>There's a lot of things that have an influence on the final quality of a
>>FS, like component tolerances and the precision of adjustments, and the
>pcb layout of course. So you can only judge it when you have tried the
>real thing. But as you have asked about the circuit - yes, it looks good.

While that certainly sounds hopeful, the point has been made that
pre-assembled 3rd-party "MOTM" modules are not as educational or as easy to
modify as those that come with schematics. That's why I asked.