Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-03 01:33 UTC

Thread

Re: [motm] Doepfer A-105 --> Everybody is a theif

Re: [motm] Doepfer A-105 --> Everybody is a theif

2001-04-24 by elhardt@aol.com

oakley@... writes:

>>However, I will not remove my circuits from the net.  People like Doepfer 
are just thieves.  Its extremely ironic that he suggests using 'his' 
interpolator module to get VC control of filter shape. The man has no 
decency!<<

Everytime I see things like this come up I am amazed at what warped 
viewpoints get posted.  Who knows whether Doepfer just grapped the schematic 
to replicate or if he simply is incorporating some features he sees into a 
circuit designed from scratch.  In addition, all this finger pointing at 
Doepfer as theives coming from those who in themselves are copying the 
designs and engineering of others doesn't quite seem right.  It's also 
strange coming from those on the MOTM list when so far all the current MOTM 
filters, and yet to be released ones are rip-offs of Korg, SSM, and Oberheim 
designs.  And one of the modules that Doepfer came out with that people said 
he stole from JH, was infact a variation on a Polyfusion module that JH 
didn't exactly invent himself.  The ridiculousness of it all.

mark@... writes:

>>Then again, you can't clone quality.<<

Sure you can.  Just use the same components which can be bought by anybody.

-Elhardt

Re: [motm] Doepfer A-105 --> Everybody is a theif

2001-04-24 by Tony Allgood

Hi Kenneth and all,

>In addition, all this finger pointing at Doepfer as theives coming from
those who in themselves are copying the designs and engineering of
others doesn't quite seem right.

You are right in the strictest sense. But there is a big difference, to
me at least, of what myself and Paul are doing. Korg no longer make the
MS-20, it hasn't been made for twenty years or so. The TB303 hasn't been
made for a similar time. By releasing the MOTM-420 and the TB3030, we
are not doing any harm to sales of new TB303s and MS20s. Furthermore,
both of us have added to the value of the designs we have liberated. I
believe Doepfer has not. He has taken the MultiLadder, already a modular
panel, and bunged it on one of his panels.

I have the circuits for the Serge Wavemultiplier. Probably the only
module that I would like to copy from his range. But it will not be a
Oakley module.

There is a question of decency here. Deopfer is small business, I am
too. I thought there was decency among the little guys. Perhaps not. But
as I have said on the DIY list I am not angry. Far from it. And in some
ways I am flattered.

And true, I am not the only person to have discovered multi-tapped
filters. The 3320 based Oberheim Expander was the inspiration for the
MultiLadder. However, for patent reasons probably, this was never done
on any Moog ladder before to my good knowledge. The ARP Qaudra's phaser
was probably the closest any one got. My work with Moog ladders goes
back a mere five years, and SuperLadder was born from that. Discussions
about my findings with the subtraction of rung one and rung four of the
ladder on the synth DIY list with Magnus Danielson and Grant Richter led
me to the Oberheim Expander. From then the MultiLadder was born. So yes,
it was the fruits of many people, but I don't hide that. Its all on
public view and I have thanked people for this. Doepfer does not.

Regards,

Tony Allgood  Penrith, Cumbria, England

Oakley Modular Synth and TB3030:
www.techrepairs.freeserve.co.uk/projects.htm
My music: www.mp3.com/taklamakan

Re: [motm] Doepfer A-105 --> Everybody is a theif

2001-05-05 by jhaible@t-online.de

> >>However, I will not remove my circuits from the net.  People like
Doepfer
> are just thieves.  Its extremely ironic that he suggests using 'his'
> interpolator module to get VC control of filter shape. The man has no
> decency!<<
>
> Everytime I see things like this come up I am amazed at what warped
> viewpoints get posted.  Who knows whether Doepfer just grapped the
schematic
> to replicate or if he simply is incorporating some features he sees into a
> circuit designed from scratch.  In addition, all this finger pointing at
> Doepfer as theives coming from those who in themselves are copying the
> designs and engineering of others doesn't quite seem right.  It's also
> strange coming from those on the MOTM list when so far all the current
MOTM
> filters, and yet to be released ones are rip-offs of Korg, SSM, and
Oberheim
> designs.  And one of the modules that Doepfer came out with that people
said
> he stole from JH, was infact a variation on a Polyfusion module that JH
> didn't exactly invent himself.  The ridiculousness of it all.

Polyfusion ? What Polyfusion ??

Just to clarify: My SSM-style VCF for MOTM is not just a clone of the
SSM chip, or of any existing circuit that uses the SSM2040 chip. While
it's capable to emulate the standard 2040 application (as in Prophet 5
etc.), you cannot emulate some of my filter's features with any circuit
built around an original SSM2040. (You could, if you had access to
an internal node of the chip.)
Believe it or not, I spent weeks of Spice simulation and testing to
make that circuit what it is. A good deal of that was to explore
things that belong to "forbidden conditions" according to the SSM
publications (and which therefore was avoided by all manufacturers
that used the chip back then).

JH.

Re: [motm] Doepfer A-105 --> Everybody is a theif

2001-05-06 by elhardt@aol.com

jhaible@... writes:

>>Polyfusion ? What Polyfusion ??
 Just to clarify: My SSM-style VCF for MOTM is not just a clone of the
SSM chip, or of any existing circuit that uses the SSM2040 chip.<<

Doepfer's module was similar to the Polyfusion Quadrature LFO.  But when 
Doepfer anounced it, everybody said they stole the idea from you.  I was just 
pointing out the fact that a similar module was around way back on the 
Polyfusion.

-Elhardt

Re: [motm] Doepfer A-105 --> Everybody is a theif

2001-05-06 by jhaible@t-online.de

> Doepfer's module was similar to the Polyfusion Quadrature LFO.  But when
> Doepfer anounced it, everybody said they stole the idea from you.  I was
just
> pointing out that the idea was around way back on the Polyfusion.

Quadrature LFO ?
I never heard of anybody talking about this.
Normally people who accuse him of stealing refer to other things.
Personally I avoid the word stealing, and I'm generally sick of
reiterating all that, so don't ask me "what exactly is it about"
- it's all in the archives of synth-diy. He does what he does, it's
certainly
not illegal, but personally I despise him and I see the reasons for others
to have the same feelings.
Strange how all that is altered and transformed by word of mouth
(and of email). Who came up with that QLFO Polyfusion thing ?

JH.