Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 50 of 690 · 34488 messages matched

Plans are set

2009-02-18 by Paul Schreiber

What I plan to do is as follows (in order): a) finish up the E340 (about 20 hours of CAD time left, both pcb and mechanical) b) schematic capture the SEM VCF

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] MOTM-730 question

2009-02-18 by Paul Schreiber

... There are 3 important things to understand about the 730: a) the *width* of the input pulse is not important. b) the output pulses will *always* be 50%

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Erik Olson

#1: Cloud Generator The prospect of this capability is what got me started on MOTM in the first place! I haven t been keeping up well with the modular synth

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by James Elliott

1) SEM (CV controlled morph - ummmm YEA!!!!!) 2) FFB (Only if it has CV Controlled bands) 3) Cloud ________________________________ From: Charles Stella

Thread view Attachments: 0

MOTM-730 question

2009-02-17 by Girts R

I have lost in basic divider function principles, can someone give a hint, please? For example, if input of a 730 is gates of a keyboard and some triplets

Thread view Attachments: 0

MOTM 120 Sub Octave Multiplexer CHEAP

2009-02-17 by Carlos

For Sale (this were all bought fully assembled and tested directly from MOTM): MOTM-410 Triple Resonant Filter SOLD MOTM-440 Discrete OTA VC Lowpass Filter

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Charles Stella

1. SEM 2. FFB 3. Cloud Thanks! Charles. ... Charles Stella http://www.charlesstella.net http://www.amygdalahijack.com http://www.myspace.com/charlesstella

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by cormallen

a) Parametric EQ. b) Cloud Generator. c) SEM VCF I have quite a lot of filters in my MOTM (7 at the last count), so I probably wouldn t buy a SEM VCF unless

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Marc Bareille

Hi , 1) FFB but only if it have CV I/Os on each bands... Else i will go do my own design... 2) Cloud Generator ...why not i seems to be an interesting

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by thomas white

Cloud Generator for me! SEM will be cool too. I no longer need the FFB (thought it was dead in the water and built a Moog clone from Yves Yusson) Thomas White

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Eric Frampton

Those modules in that order. I m in for all of them. e ... -- Eric Frampton, keyboards Atlanta, Georgia, USA http://www.ericframpton.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by George Kisslak

My choices, in order, are: 1) Dual VCA w/Pan/Fade 2) Pulse Divider 3) uVCO Huh? Oh, whoops! That was my list from 2001. Ok, my list is: 1) Dual VCA w/Pan/Fade

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Essential modules

2009-02-17 by eric f

There s an implicit assumption in the email below that I ve been chewing on all day. Any module worth producing, esoteric or not, implements some function we

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Aardvark

For me it s 1) FFB 2) SEM VCF 3) Cloud Generator I ll still be happy if the SEM was 1st. I m just not sure I could justify dropping 500 bucks on a Cloud

Thread view Attachments: 0

[motm] Re: Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Scott K Warren

I vote for this order: 1. SEM VCF 2. FFB 3. Cloud Generator But I also want to second Bill & Will s enthusiasm for a modular parametric EQ with voltage

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by wjhall11

Hear, hear. Will and I discussed it - 1. Cloud Generator ( cause it s nearly done, right?) 2. then we d gladly take on the SEM VCF 3. then for sure the FFB

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by John L Rice

d) MOTM-600 micro sequencer!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (of course, I realize I may be overly confident in assuming that Paul wont be motivated enough to actually throw a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by gerry_kuhn

For my interests: 1. SEM VCF 2. Cloud Generator (a close 2nd) But I would be about 1 year away from an SEM VCF purchase, in case that influences things.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Jason Proctor

1. isn t the Cloud basically done? i saw it work at AHBA 2007, 1.5 years ago. seems sensible to start with that. 2. SEM VCF in traditional thru-hole

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Greg James

Now that s a hard one - seriously! I don t care, I m in for all of them. -Greg ... From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Miguel Mendoza

My choice: 1. Cloud Generator 2. FFB/EQ 3. Another filter Cheers! Miguel Mendoza. ... From: Paul Schreiber To: MOTM List Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 1:30

Thread view Attachments: 0

Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Paul Schreiber

After reading everyone s inputs for what is desired for a DIY/pc board only (or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I ve decided to work

Thread view Attachments: 0

Stooge panel/cable/case update...

2009-02-16 by Doug Wellington

Hey everybody, Just a quick note - when I went in to donate bone marrow for the leukemia patient I matched, I was given a complete physical, including EKG,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Essential modules

2009-02-16 by edgard_varese

Having extolled the virtues of digital modules, I m still interested in unusual analog filters. What about a wide-range dome filter with inverters, allowing us

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Essential modules

2009-02-16 by Stephen Drake

Lots of interesting posts recently. I haven t had much to add - others are covering my basics. I d really like a motm delay/flanger/phaser module. There s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Essential modules

2009-02-16 by Stephen Drake

Lots of interesting posts recently. I haven t had much to add - others are covering my basics. I d really like a motm delay/flanger/phaser module. There s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Essential modules

2009-02-16 by edgard_varese

I think that the SMT modules will sell. I suspect that the slow divider sales are caused in part by saving for the cloud generator. I understand that you

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Essential modules

2009-02-16 by Greg James

Responses what essential modules, not available from other sources, are still missing in the MOTM line. I would say none, now that Bridechamber and Krisp1

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Essential modules

2009-02-16 by ROV PILOT

Could a cv recorder be considered as an estoreric module ? (sorry if this proposal has already been made). A cv recorder with of course loop start/end/duration

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Essential modules

2009-02-16 by Miguel Mendoza

For me it s very simple, there are a lot of MOTM filters, the 440 is one of the best filters I ever hear. I would love a kind of SAM 16 sequencer in MOTM

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.