> > > >HA! This begs the question (to all you EE-wannabes), "why is it done this > > >way?" > > > > > >Hint: it has to do with *chemistry*, not "electronics". > I can pipe in here. In the past 10 years the Nuclear navy has switched the > way they teach this a half dozen times. I learned it as "electron flow" > (conventional current flow) + to - in my electrician school. Then in > nuclear power school they said the Navy is going to start teaching "hole > flow". The idea was - to +. The hole comes from the space left by the > electron that just "vacated" a "hole". WHATEVER. The idea is there is a > difference in potential (voltage) and without it there is no current flow > whether it is + to - or - to+. I love this conversation. In the end it > usually leaves those with any insecurities in there knowledge sure of only > one thing - they don't know anymore. Bzzzzztttt! Wrong. Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] More OT: PS Question
2000-09-13 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.