Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] More OT: PS Question

2000-09-13 by Paul Schreiber

>
> > >HA! This begs the question (to all you EE-wannabes), "why is it done
this
> > >way?"
> > >
> > >Hint: it has to do with *chemistry*, not "electronics".

> I can pipe in here.  In the past 10 years the Nuclear navy has switched
the
> way they teach this a half dozen times.  I learned it as "electron flow"
> (conventional current flow) + to - in my electrician school.  Then in
> nuclear power school they said the Navy is going to start teaching "hole
> flow".  The idea was - to +.  The hole comes from the space left by the
> electron that just "vacated" a "hole".  WHATEVER.  The idea is there is a
> difference in potential (voltage) and without it there is no current flow
> whether it is + to - or - to+.  I love this conversation.  In the end it
> usually leaves those with any insecurities in there knowledge sure of only
> one thing - they don't know anymore.

Bzzzzztttt!

Wrong.

Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.