Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

RE: [motm] Food for thought

2000-08-22 by David Bivins

Being a bit vain and snobbish, I *would* like an "offical" MOTM mult
regardless of how simple they are. Even if Paul were to only supply
faceplates with MOTM-consistent graphics, that would be great. I'm using a
patchbay as a mult now, and though it works fine, I'd love to litter my
system with several 1U mult panels...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: davevosh@... [mailto:davevosh@...]
> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 5:42 PM
> To: motm@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] Food for thought
> 
> 
> In a message dated 00-08-19 16:39:46 EDT, you write:
> 
> <<  Anybody can make a mult
>  or mixer. >>
> 
> 
> john,
> while the mult is pretty obvious, mixers can be a more subtle thing. 
> optimised for cv or audio ? one unit to do both or separate 
> modules? each 
> type (vc / audio ) to be super spec`s or just adequate for 
> both ?  i think i 
> recall paul speaking on the problems here related to op amp 
> selection and 
> related things - ?  not as hard a proposition as a vco maybe 
> but one that has 
> its own pitfalls!
> best,
> dave v.
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------<e|-
> Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/8014/6/_/529958/_/966728514/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------|e>-
> 
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.