MOTM

Longer delays are difficult because we are all digial. The cap-based stuff
is easier but not
as accurate or repeatable. Guess you'll need 5 or 6 and daisy-chain :)

We are using small RAM PIC processors and the code is all working.

Paul S.

----- Original Message -----
From: "alt-mode" <alt_mode@...>
To: <motm@egroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] Food for thought


> --- The Old Crow <oldcrow@...> wrote:
> >   My prototype had LEDs on the outputs.  Rather impractical on a 13-jack
> > 2U panel, though.
> >
> Yes, that seems to be a perpetual problem.  I think I'm comfortable with
no LEDs but
> I'm not sure if others on the list are ;)
>
> >   1) It is a 0 to 9.999s dual delay.  the '1000ms' in the name at the
> > bottom is missing a zero.
> >
> Ah, that's much better!   What about something more than 10sec?  I admit
that's
> pushing it but we have a VCLFO that cycles in minutes, why not a pulse
delay?
>
> >   2) The buttons use a set of routines I wrote to control various
process
> > controllers.  There are a number of increment/decrement rates based on
how
> > long the button is depressed.
> >
> Cool!
>
> Eric
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>
> 
>
>
>