On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, alt-mode wrote: > Interesting stuff. For the VC divider, I'm torn about wanting LEDs on > the outputs. They are useful when running sync pulses but they get > down right annoying when run at audio levels. This is based on my > experience with the Doepfer clock divider and sequencer. My prototype had LEDs on the outputs. Rather impractical on a 13-jack 2U panel, though. > For the trigger delay Paul, I think you can do much better, only 1 > second? The old Moog dual trigger delay goes to 10 seconds. Yes, it > isn't accurate but I have used it to bring in an evelope or trigger an > event very late in a sustained sound. I would expect that a studly > MOTM module would be able to go to 100 sec! So, put a range switch on > that sucker and get some real trigger delays going. Of course, > something lower than 1ms can also be used for audio range effects too! > I think my LED comments also apply here. Finally, if you must use > buttons to set the values, please make it so that if you are pressing > the button for one direction, either it accelerates the > increment/decrement speed or you can accelerate the speed by push the > other button while holding the first. (I hope that made sense). 1) It is a 0 to 9.999s dual delay. the '1000ms' in the name at the bottom is missing a zero. 2) The buttons use a set of routines I wrote to control various process controllers. There are a number of increment/decrement rates based on how long the button is depressed. 3) That "<FREQ>" on the delay panel is a typo. And lastly, these panel images were my initial ideas. End results may be a bit different. Crow /**/
Message
Re: [motm] Food for thought
2000-08-19 by The Old Crow
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.