Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:20 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?

2000-04-20 by Ben Vehorn

Agreed--analog delays in general tend to be noisier than their digital
counterparts. Many flangers and phasers tend to derive their "whoosh"
sound from the noise that is mixed in.

I'm not familiar with the DN34, but I have the DN36 and I quite like it.
I imagine they are from the same series, though. Did you ever open yours
up and look at how many ICs are in there? It puts the Synthex to
shame...

ivancu@... wrote:

>
> In a message dated 04/20/2000 7:44:13 AM, ben@... writes:
>
> << I have a Marshall Time Modulator and there is absolutely no
> noticeable
> noise whatsoever. The spec sheet rates the signal to noise ratio at
> 90dB
> or something like that, and I certainly don't think they were lying.
> Maybe yours was broken? >>
>
> It was unfair of me to make that comment in reference to the Marshall
> Time
> Modulator.  They are very quiet units.  Most other analog delays are
> fairly
> noisy, at least in my experience.  But the Marshall was always one of
> the
> best units out there.
>
> At one time I had a Klark Teknik DN34 analog delay... another nice
> unit.
> Wish I still had it!
>
> Ivan
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.