No, I think you have it. That's pretty much what I'm describing I guess. Of course, we don't have a MOTM band-pass filter with modulatable width, so... But that's a very good point. > -----Original Message----- > From: Brousseau, Paul E (Paul) [mailto:noise@...] > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 11:35 AM > To: 'motm@egroups.com' > Subject: RE: [motm] Purchasing decisions > > > I'm not quite clear... how is this different from a band-pass filter with > modulated Q / width and frequency? Not that it wouldn't be > really cool, I'm > just wondering if I'm missing a nuance? > > --PBr > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Bivins [SMTP:dbivins@...] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:10 AM > > To: motm@egroups.com > > Subject: RE: [motm] Purchasing decisions > > > > Just think of how much fun (and how > > useful) it would be to control both of those expressive > elements at once! > > Consider multiplying a keyboard tracking CV and inputting it into FM1 of > > each filter, with a slightly different offset on each; how > about the same > > patch but with a lag processor between one of the CVs and one of the FM > > inputs! I'm salivating. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > PERFORM CPR ON YOUR APR! > Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as > 0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. > Apply NOW! > http://click.egroups.com/1/2121/3/_/529958/_/954955989/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Message
RE: [motm] Purchasing decisions
2000-04-05 by David Bivins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.