> ???? > > The 410's built in LFO does not have sync capabilities. However if you have > a 320, you should be able to sync it to the 606 trigger, and plug it in to > the 410 overriding the internal LFO. i think i'm confused between sync and voltage controlled. forgive my newbiness. > The mysterious resistor just changes the audil input gain of the filter, > optimizing it for the weaker signals outside the MOTM system. ah, okay. easy one. > Right. Let me be more clear if I was not before: I was sending triggers to > the 800 EG and the 320 LFO. The LFO and EG were then modulating the 420--it > had nothing to do with the 120. The 120 was just supplying audio into the > filter and wasn't being modulated itself. What Dave said is intelligent--use > the 320 to override the internal LFO of the 410. okay, but feeding the trigger out of the 606 into the 120 does produce a sound, albeit a rather limited click. > Now, having said that, let me stir up the pot again--set up the patch the > same way (audio into 120, see, i can't get sound if i audio out of the 606 into the 120. it was the first thing i tried upon building it. > 120 into 420 or 440, trigger into 320 and 800, 320 > and 800 modulating FM1 & FM2 of 4X0), then send a separate LFO output into > the "B" input of the 120 in cross mode, with "to taste" settings of the > suboctaves. Playing with the shape and rate of the LFO, you may be able to > get stepping out of the 120 that's rhythmically compatible. okay, that works. i can clearly see i'm going to need more modules! but isn't that always the case? alex
Message
Re: clocking the 410
2000-03-31 by Alexander S. Dickey
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.