Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: clocking the 410

2000-03-31 by Alexander S. Dickey

> ????
> 
> The 410's built in LFO does not have sync capabilities. However if you have
> a 320, you should be able to sync it to the 606 trigger, and plug it in to
> the 410 overriding the internal LFO.

i think i'm confused between sync and voltage controlled.  forgive my
newbiness.

> The mysterious resistor just changes the audil input gain of the filter,
> optimizing it for the weaker signals outside the MOTM system.

ah, okay.  easy one.

> Right. Let me be more clear if I was not before: I was sending triggers to
> the 800 EG and the 320 LFO. The LFO and EG were then modulating the 420--it
> had nothing to do with the 120. The 120 was just supplying audio into the
> filter and wasn't being modulated itself. What Dave said is intelligent--use
> the 320 to override the internal LFO of the 410.

okay, but feeding the trigger out of the 606 into the 120 does produce a
sound, albeit a rather limited click.

> Now, having said that, let me stir up the pot again--set up the patch the
> same way (audio into 120, 

see, i can't get sound if i audio out of the 606 into the 120.  it was
the first thing i tried upon building it.

> 120 into 420 or 440, trigger into 320 and 800, 320
> and 800 modulating FM1 & FM2 of 4X0), then send a separate LFO output into
> the "B" input of the 120 in cross mode, with "to taste" settings of the
> suboctaves. Playing with the shape and rate of the LFO, you may be able to
> get stepping out of the 120 that's rhythmically compatible.

okay, that works.  i can clearly see i'm going to need more modules! 
but isn't that always the case?

alex

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.