In a message dated 2/2/2000 10:00:43 AM, dbivins@... writes: >I'm distracted by work and can't think straight. An AR envelope generator >would only require a trigger, correct? Or the leading edge of a gate? The >gate length is irrelevant, correct? Otherwise it would be ASR? Why am I >so >clueless today? Anyday? What I mean when I say AD/AR EG is that the output would be switchable between one setting (AD) which will go from an attack phase immediately to a decay phase (turn your sustain to zero on your ADSR to experiment with this), and a second setting (AR) which will act like an ASR EG with the sustain length being determined by the gate length (turn your decay to zero and your sustain to maximum on your ADSR to experiment with this one). I believe this is an (almost) standard distinction and the reason I suggested it is that there seems to be little additional circuitry involved between these two types of EGs, but being able to switch between these two is quite useful. I might also suggest that such a module might only accept one pulse input per EG so it will typically "expect" to see a gate, but can equally operate via a trigger (which would naturally give only AD response regardless of the switches setting). I'm not at all sure that this part of the circuit would work, however. JB
Message
Re: dumb question - dumb answer anyone?
2000-02-03 by JWBarlow@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.