Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Message

RE: [motm] Quantizer modules (was List of...)

2009-02-16 by Greg James

"The longer this function remains unaddressed."

 

Exactly the reason why I bought my 4 OMS VC-ADSR's and 2 OMS 804s from Paul
(Krisp1) over the last several months. I can't wait years for essential
modules.

 

Don't get me wrong, the esoteric stuff is great. But I want to build upon a
core, well-spec'd, MOTM quality, analog system.

 

-Greg

 

  _____  

From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of eric f
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 10:46 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] Quantizer modules (was List of...)

 


Any quantizer delivered by Synth Tech would have to offer features that are
significantly different from the current offerings on the market.  Apart
from using tuning tables (which would allow it to be used like a sequencer
when driven from an LFO or the 730) and thereby allowing microtuning
(mentioned in another email), I can't think of anything.  It would have to
be partnered with another function.  

There's also, as John alludes to, the time to market factor.  The longer
this function remains unaddressed in the product line, the more likely users
are to pursue and purchase existing solutions, of which there are several.

cheers,
eric f



--- On Sun, 2/15/09, John L Rice <Drummer@...> wrote:

From: John L Rice <Drummer@...>
Subject: RE: [motm] Re: List of proposed/discussed modules
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 5:34 PM

A quantizer is high on my list but unless something else comes along that
seems like a better fit, I'll be getting the Modcan 55B.

John L Rice 

-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups. <mailto:motm%40yahoogroups.com>  com
[mailto:motm@yahoogroups. <mailto:motm%40yahoogroups.com>  com] On Behalf Of
Richard Brewster
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 3:19 PM
To: cormallen
Cc: motm@yahoogroups. <mailto:motm%40yahoogroups.com>  com
Subject: Re: [motm] Re: List of proposed/discussed modules

I use quantizers quite a bit. I have two Wiard/Blacet Miniwaves and 
also a Modcan Dual Quantizer 55B. The Modcan is a very nice quantizer 
with all the features I need. But if Paul Schreiber makes any control 
voltage module with a quantizer, I'll be in for one or two of those.

Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix. com <http://www.pugix.com> 

cormallen wrote:
> I'd *love* a CV quantizer - I've tried using my Miniwaves for
> quantization, but 8-bit lookup tables aren't accurate enough for
> pleasant tuning! Ideally a quantizer with at least two channels...
>
> On the list below, I'd be particularly interested in the 130 Pan/Fade,
> 810 VC-EG, 2?? Delay and 450 FFB. (Oh, and the vocoder, if I could
> afford it!)
>
> (I'm also really tempted by the modcan vector fader. Anyone made a
> black panel for that one?)
>
> Harry
> 

------------ --------- --------- ------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.