Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Totally against *any* assembled module?

2009-02-13 by Scott Juskiw

For me, the joy of synths comes from these sources:

1. coming up with an idea for a useful module, could be based on some  
existing piece of hardware
2. figuring out how to actually build the thing, usually with a  
breadboard
3. making a board layout
4. building a prototype
5. testing and tweaking the prototype
6. building the final version
7. using the new module to create sounds

With a fully assembled module, I only get #7. With a kit, I still get  
to build it and test it. And there's always the possibility of hacking  
in some modification or tweaking some resistor values to enhance  
functionality (like the Oakley OMS-410 or Larry's 110 VCA resistor  
tweaking). That's not so easy to do with an assembled SMT unit,  
especially if you don't even get a schematic with it. So a kit, even  
if it's just a board and panel, is still a lot more fun than a "plug  
and play" unit.

However, I'm not completely opposed to assembled units. I have the  
Encore Electronics UEG and FS, but in those cases they weren't  
available as kits, and there wasn't a good DIY alternative at the  
time. I'm not biased against the 520 and 730 as assembled units, but I  
would look for DIY alternatives if I considered those to be "must  
have" modules.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.