Mike Estee writes: >>That stuborness is one of the reasons I'm a motm customer. It's the commitment to signal path quality. Sure, I could get the doepfer modules, but sometimes I don't like hearing my clock line/powersupply/evening news in my signal path. I'd rather paul ditched a module than his principles.<< It's not the electronics part that I'm talking about. As Paul said, that's only about %25 of the cost. It's expensive knobs and pots, or whatever is pushing the thing to the point where people don't want to spend the money. Tony from Encore Electronics for instance, puts 15 pots and knobs on the UEG using a completely different system, and it seems like maybe a better way to go for higher knobcount type stuff. And a lot faster to build to boot. Won't need to go 3U wide either even at 15 or more bands, which is what I think the 450 should have been to begin with. (If the 450 was going to be 3U, can't remember). Paul has already ditched some of his principles by going fracrack, so let's maybe continue that trend a bit further. :-) -Elhardt
Message
Re: [motm] Replacement for MOTM-450
2006-07-14 by Kenneth Elhardt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.