Actually, I like the idea of an analog parametric EQ module... I don't have a mixer with a really good EQ on it but a couple channels of decent EQ could come in handy, especially if there's no filter bank. ...Craig > -----Original Message----- > From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of Scott Juskiw > Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 12:58 PM > To: motm@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [motm] Replacement for MOTM-450 > > I was looking back at some of Kenneth Elhardt's patches and > notes where he uses 15 and 31 band equalizers to synthesize > resonant cavities. I figured an AudioEngine version of that > would be much smaller than it's analogue equivalent. > > Thanks for reminding me about the MURF, I had forgotten about > that one. And thanks for the wavemakers link, that one's new to me. > > >Try the Moogerfooger MURF. It is essentially an animated > Filter Bank. > >Sound quality and useability is superb. > > > >As for a programmable parametric equalizer, here's a concept > from about > >26 years ago: http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/328rpg1.html :-) > > > >You can do anything with the AudioEngine core, but it won't > be analog. > >I'd propose that its greatest value is in modules that are > difficult to > >do with > >analog: Granular synthesis, low noise vocoder with 30+ bands, long > >echos/delays/tape loops, etc. > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [motm] Replacement for MOTM-450
2006-07-10 by Craig Critchley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.