Adam's right. I've got two 410's - one with the wonderful Oakley OMS- 410 expansion module - and I couldn't get along without them! One is enough for a great stereo sound, but two allow you to go nuts with the CV inputs for depth and rate and create a very animated sound field. Now to be fair, I don't own a '480 - yet! When the date arrives for the big sale, however, don't stand in between me and that filter! If it says "Synthesis Technology" on the front panel, it is a necessary module. Chub - Mister Two of Everything, Please. --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Adam Schabtach" <adam@...> wrote: > > FWIW: I have all of the filters that you list. I really like both the 410 > and the 480, and it would be hard to choose one over the other. The 410 is > unique among the MOTM filters because of its triple-BP topology; the 480 is > possibly more useful in a general-purpose sense. Given your other choices > the 410 would probably provide more variety than the 480. I like the 410 so > much that I got a second one (for stereo!), but will also be adding a second > 480 to my system during the BIG SALE. > > --Adam > > > > _____ > > From: Phil Peery [mailto:ppeery@...] > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:53 PM > To: motm@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [motm] filter selection.... > > > > Hi everyone, > > With the BIG SALE coming up, I've been thinking about filter > selection. I've already got a 420 and a 490, and am going for the > MOTM-440, but due to current budget, can only get one other filter at > this time. I've been going back and forth between the 410 and the > 480. I do really like the vocal formant sounds that you can get from > the 410, but the 480, along with the mods at www.pugix.com also look > really cool. I'd like to get some opinions to help me choose between > the two. > > Thanks! > > Phil >
Message
Re: filter selection....
2006-07-06 by Charles Osthelder
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.