MOTM

>Another ditto.  I am now convinced that a quantizer function is too rich
>with possibilities to warrant inclusion in this simple S&H module.  Yes,
>it was I who brought it up.  I was brainstorming.  This collaborative
>design is great.  The best ideas stick and the more off-the-wall  ideas
>shake out and maybe lead to other module design ideas.  A consensus is
>converging that a MOTM-102 should not include noise or quantizing.  If
>you take those out, we're left with the remaining good ideas and it is
>simple enough to fit in 1U.  Agree?  Or do you still want noise or
>quantizing in this little module?

Would like to have...

I like the output correlation. I like the positive/negative edge 
trigger switch. I like the infinite hold. I like the shifting (ASR), 
especially if it can cascade from one 102 to another 102. I would 
also like to have all outputs be able to sample/hold a unique value 
when not in ASR mode.

Would not object to having...

Additional white/pink/random outputs, but not at the expense of the 
S&H capabilities.

Don't need...

Quantizing. A440 reference tone (just kidding).