Steve Maietta writes: >>It seems that audio is going from left to right and cv's, gates etc come into modules from the bottom. This should be standardized as well to make digestability quick and easy.<< Yeah, that's the way it should be done. But it is amazing how many people fight against that most logical way of thinking when it comes to placing modules in their synth. There have been entire threads where people argue against left to right flow and control coming from the bottom. Go figure. Mike Estee writes: >>You wouldn't happen to have this sound as an MP3 anywhere? I was trying to recreate the patch on my MOTM, but the slider positions mean nothing to me as I don't have a roland modular ;) I might have recreated, I might not have. I have no idea.<< Nope. The Roland books didn't come with any tapes/records. For a synth other than theirs, you just have to look at the basic patch connections and then set knobs by ear. Scott Juskiw writes: >>Signal sources (oscillators, noise generators, microphone) are often represented with a circle. Modifiers (VCF, VCA, inverter) are often represented with a triangle (like an op amp). Controllers (ADSR, keyboard, sequencer, bias source) are often represented with a rectangle. But eventually even this breaks down because LFOs can be considered controllers at low frequency or signal sources at audible frequency.<< Some of this also makes sense. However I noticed they don't use a triangle for mixers. Since a mixer takes several signals in at the left and output one to the right, a triangle makes most sense there. And as you point out there are lots of modules that don't fit any catagory, such as sequential swithes, s/h modules, ring modulators, delay lines, and so on. Perhaps squares/rectangles for all misc modules. -Elhardt
Message
Re: [motm] motm patch documentation project
2005-06-18 by Kenneth Elhardt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.