> > > Once you have a couple of 300s, the 310s are great for > > getting a lot of bang for the panel space buck. They have > > a nifty variable saw to pulse output that the 300 > > doesn't. > > Is there a patch available to have the 310's Shape CV > controlled? I guess the PWM input doesn't change the shape, > right? > And expanding on Robert's question, I haven't been able to figure out if the PWM cv 'always' effects the pulse width or just effects the pulse width when the shape pot is nearly all the way to the right (for pulse only). Any comments? Maybe it is just that the PWM effect is less discernable the more the saw waveshape contributes to the overall waveshape? Jeff
Message
Re: [motm] 300 versus 310
2004-01-08 by Jeffrey Pontius
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.