MOTM

On Thursday 08 January 2004 16:50, mate_stubb wrote:
> Here's my take on 300 vs. 310 VCOs.
>
> Find a way to try both. Depending on the room you have in
> your system to devote to VCOs, I'd start with one or more
> 300s. The extra triangle and sine outputs are invaluable,
> not to mention linear FM and sync inputs. You really have
> a much wider tonal palette to synthesize from.

But do the 310's pulse and saw outputs sound identical to 
the 300? Or is the 300 about 1U fatter in that respect? ;)


> Once you have a couple of 300s, the 310s are great for
> getting a lot of bang for the panel space buck. They have
> a nifty variable saw to pulse output that the 300
> doesn't.

Is there a patch available to have the 310's Shape CV 
controlled? I guess the PWM input doesn't change the shape, 
right?

- Robert