OK, here are three more drawing with various options. This one shows 0,3,7,10 on the 6 knobs, and the shift knobs have lost the + signs: http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_ProductionNumbers037A.jpg This one has numbers only on the shift knobs (no + signs as well): http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_ProductionNumbersIF.jpg This one shows 0 and 10 on the 6 knobs, and the shift knobs have lost the + signs: http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_ProductionNumbersIF0A.jpg Anything in that subdirectory is available for the final product. You people vote for what you want... Tony -----Original Message----- From: Scott Juskiw [mailto:scott@...] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 5:38 PM To: tony@...; motm@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - one 'final' question Good grief, here we go with a bazillion opinions. IMHO, leave the + signs off all the numbers, even for the Initial Shift (I think we can figure out that "8" means positive 8). Add numbers to the Fine Shift knob. For the other 6 knobs, either leave the numbers off entirely, or only use numbers that can be replicated the same on all six knobs (looks like this would only be numbers 0,3,7,10). Thanks for asking for our input Tony. At 4:51 PM -0800 2003/12/08, Tony Karavidas wrote: >Ok here's the one with "+" on the fine shift. I made the "+" a smaller >font size and that tightened it up a bit. > >http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_ProductionNumbersAllBip.j >pg > >Now I'm not sure which one I like the best. > >Let me know... >Tony >
Message
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - one 'final' question, really.. :)
2003-12-09 by Tony Karavidas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.