I agree that hands free should be possible. So, it can be started and stopped remotely using the gate in. I think the idea of having to pull the cable is very bad. Could it operate like this? 1. complete remote start and stop, no intervention on the panel required. Or, "as the gates flow." 2. "Stop" on the panel overrides all remote gate start / stop function, so when you hit stop in the "gated play "mode, it stops and stays stopped no matter how many gates it receives. 3. "Start" on the panel cancels the "stop" function and allows the restart once gate input action resumes. Seems like in the "gated play" mode start and stop could support that function but would not actually be required use. They would be almost like "arm" and "disarm" buttons for the gate signals. Larry H ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@...> Seems like I'm already in the minority, but I would prefer the "hands free" option, if there is only one option to choose. I'd prefer having to cease a gate operation (e.g., run the gate through an attenuator), and the 'remote' operation allows a lot more flexibility. Jeff
Message
Re: [motm] uSeq function poll
2003-05-30 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.