This is an interesting idea, but I think the list would need another column if I were looking at the whole aspect of module usage. Perhaps 'functional outputs' or something. Rating the Sub-oct-mux as zero appears to be missing the whole point of the module. > Doing the math shows that adding the OMS-410 increased the functional density only a tad from 2.5 to 2.66. Yes, but the 'density' list allows internal modulators to be counted as sources. The MOTM-410s LFOs are not accesible as separate entities. One of the requests that people made on the Oakley group was to make these available to the front panel. Hence the use of the OMS-410. I actually end up using the 410's LFOs for all sorts of other things too. > Being an old Serge guy, I long for the Serge dual slewing module. Advert time: You may want to take a look at the OMS-820 with MOTM-820 combination. And it has four pretty LEDs that flash very nicely. Tony
Message
Re: [motm] Functional density - or what to do while waiting for your MOTM modules
2002-08-19 by Tony Allgood