Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-14 00:02 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Opinions on surface mounting

2002-05-08 by Craig Critchley

I don't think I mind too much, at least not for the not-so-teeny devices
you're talking about.  These days having so much stuff in surface mount
probably means dealing with it eventually, and I may as well learn it from
the school of MOTM.

Does the $30 option mean you select different, more expensive parts
available in DIP, or does it mean some kind of DIP adapter?  I soldered an
SO-16 onto one of those once (it was a little PCB with pads and some .1"
pins, only time I've ever tried anything surface mount).  It seemed to work
ok, but the adapter itself was relatively expensive.  If $30 could buy
better specs in all DIP, I'd be happy with that, but if its just going for
adapters, I think I'd just as soon learn to solder the surface mount parts.

I can appreciate that a lot of people would prefer to keep things simpler,
of course, and "advanced techniques" probably belong in the advanced kits...

                ...Craig

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
To: "MOTM listserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:08 PM
Subject: [motm] Opinions on surface mounting


> Looking ahead, there are some ICs of interest ONLY available in surface
mount. But, not the
> teeny-tiny, cellphone stuff. Rather, your "standard" SO-8 / SO-16 (0.050
lead pitch) sort of
> parts.
>
> These are for the 500 Series. Maybe I should offer "semi-kits" of soldered
pcb, but no
> wires/pots/etc soldered. You would still have to do this as in current
kits.
>
> What is your "comfort zone" is handling/soldering these parts? Not talking
ALL parts on the
> board, maybe 2 ICs out of 8.
>
> Or....what if I could go "all DIP" but the price of the kit was $30 more?
Worth $30 to have all
> DIP?
>
> Discuss.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.