MOTM

Hmmm, Paul's original 2x5 layout works nicely if you want to incorporate
Scott's 907A argument "octaves in a column" with a gain pot:

G  L  H
   1  2
S  3  4
E  5  6
   7  8
X X

G=gain, E=led, X=jack
1,3,5,7=250,500,1000,2000Hz; 2,4,6,8=350,700,1400,2800Hz

George

----- Original Message -----
From: J. Larry Hendry <jlarryh@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner


> Or (for discussion):
> L, 1, 2
> 3, 4, 5
> 6, 7, 8,
> S, H,G
>
> L & H obvious, S = switch G = Gain that some feel we need. (still have 8
> pots on PCBs.
> Larry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mate_stubb <mate_stubb@...>
> To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 Layout Winner
>
>
> >>>>
> Personally, I voted for the layout, not necessarily the assignment of
> which control is in which location. I think this could be improved
> on. Ideas?
> <<<<
>
> Well, there are two existing examples to choose from:
>
> 1. The Moog filterbank starts with low bands at the top and works its
> way down thus:
>
> 1  2
> 3  4
> 5  6
> 7  8
>
> 2. Desk EQs start at the bottom and go up, albeit in a single column:
>
> 7  8
> 5  6
> 3  4
> 1  2
>
> 3. Then you have vertical orientation possibilities:
>
> 1  5
> 2  6
> 3  7
> 4  8
>
> 4. and
>
> 4  8
> 3  7
> 2  6
> 1  5
>
> For examples 1 and 3, I'd put LP at the top left and HP at the bottom
> left, reversing their positions for examples 2 and 4. That's about
> the best you can do, given the constraints of the layout.
>
> Moe
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>