MOTM

FWIW, Number 3 has my vote.

Scott

mate_stubb wrote:
> 
> >>>>
> Personally, I voted for the layout, not necessarily the assignment of
> which control is in which location. I think this could be improved
> on. Ideas?
> <<<<
> 
> Well, there are two existing examples to choose from:
> 
> 1. The Moog filterbank starts with low bands at the top and works its
> way down thus:
> 
> 1  2
> 3  4
> 5  6
> 7  8
> 
> 2. Desk EQs start at the bottom and go up, albeit in a single column:
> 
> 7  8
> 5  6
> 3  4
> 1  2
> 
> 3. Then you have vertical orientation possibilities:
> 
> 1  5
> 2  6
> 3  7
> 4  8
> 
> 4. and
> 
> 4  8
> 3  7
> 2  6
> 1  5
> 
> For examples 1 and 3, I'd put LP at the top left and HP at the bottom
> left, reversing their positions for examples 2 and 4. That's about
> the best you can do, given the constraints of the layout.
> 
> Moe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/