MOTM

In all the controversy no one seemed to notice that cut/boost knobs
should be labeled -5 to +5, not 0 to 10.
 
Also, since any of the options seem to have some jack space left, it
would be REALLY nice to have at least one extra out.  This can save on
patching and mults, especially if you're putting this inside a feedback
loop.
John Loffink
jloffink@... 
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 5:40 PM
To: MOTM List
Subject: [motm] MOTM-450 layout
 
Well since almost everyone else has spoken their piece on this, I will
enter
mine.

1.  Actually, any layout is fine, as most have said, it is about the
sound.
Having said that, I do have some preferences.

2.  I do not like the knobs that are so low on the panel.  I guess I
would
not mind so much if the panel was crammed full.  But, it is not.  I
would
prefer that no knob is lower than what can have at least one jack under
it.
I would rather use some of the space "off board" space where the EQ I/O
switch is for a couple of the knobs / controls.

3. Since the Low and High controls are different (more shelving) and I
understand it, they are the two that make sense to move into Column 3.
One
in row  1 and one in row 4.  The space between Low and High can have
switch
and LED.

4.  I like keeping pots on the board.  But having only 2 of 10 off the
board
does not seem bad to me.

Larry Hendry






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=194081.1994012.3473453.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705
032277:HM/A=1036972/R=0/*http:/www.ediets.com/start.cfm?code=3466> Click
Here!

 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=194081.1994012.3473453.1261774/D=egrou
pmail/S=1705032277:HM/A=1036972/rand=136332959> 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Service.