mike, you say it sounds buzzy. there may be a pcb error (happened to me). just to be sure, check it with a scope on the DC setting. mark At 10:24 PM 3/20/02 +0000, you wrote: >Hello all - > >I just had an interesting session with my audio redcording software >(in this case Cool Edit 2000). I hooked a 300 directly to my console >and recorded a bit of each waveform. Did the same for the 310. > >This is probably a great opportunity to show how knowledgeable I >truly am. > >Let's start with the SQUARE out: it's not square! It goes straight >up, then exponentially down, creating a sort-of fast-attack >exponential-decay wave form above zero, then inverts the same >waveform below zero. Could this be why the square output has always >seemd a little buzzy to me? Not a bad thing, mind you. > >The SAW looks just like the positive half of the SQUARE, except that >it dips below zero a couple of db. > >The 310 OUT is the same as 300 SQUARE when 310 SHAPE is a 10. SHAPE >at 0 gives same as 300 SAW and shape at 5 is a combo of the two. > >SO the stupid question: why isn't the SQUARE square and the SAW saw? > >Mike > > > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [motm] waveforms
2002-03-20 by djarum11
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.