>why the 1u? cuz now we need a mixer to get more than one vco in >there, and we lose some control.. >hmmmmmm > >We'll need a mult to kinda mix the vcos into the filter, and now were back >to 2u, and a proper mixer would leave us at 3u.. > >just wondering since so far filters have been MOTM's forte.... >~Steve M I think it makes sense to "atomize" the modules down to their basic function. In the "old" days, the 420 and 440 needed to have a built-in mixer because there was no mixer module and hence no way to get 3 oscillators into those filters. Now we have the 830, and Paul has hinted at a 1U wide uMixer module. So there is no need to have a mixer built into any modules now. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Scott Juskiw scott@...
Message
Re: [motm] 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by Scott Juskiw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.