MOTM

At 11:20 PM -0600 12/02/01, Paul Schreiber wrote:
>
>chain which is different than current MOTM (circuit-wise). But, the uVCF
>>will be as good as the Moog ladders in the Moog monosynths (Rogue, MG-1,
>>etc) if not better.

So is the uVCF the "Moog ladder filter" you've been discussing, or is there
going to be a full-sized MOTM diode ladder filter as well??

>The tradeoff is: multiple inputs (say 3 audio ins) versus more
>attenuators. >Thinking of the Minimoog, with a separate Mixer section,
>this is the best >layout.

This is true.  You would need a five channel mixer and a wonky VCA to
completely replace a Minimoog.

>Externally mix the VCOs, but you want FM (envelope, usually) attenuation
>>RIGHT THERE on the module.

Yes, you would need both envelope modulation and key tracking, and using a
Moog to produce oscillator FM patches is very popular nowadays.  Perhaps
this is because you can't get the same sound out of any VA that does filter
FM, such as a Waldorf Q, and producers are trying to show off that they
have a real analogue.

>Now, I need the MOTM-890 uMixer: 3 GAIN pots, and 2 pair +1 inputs, 1
>>output (6 jacks).

I don't get it -- "2 pair +1 inputs" ??