MOTM

OK  Paul B,  I was beginning to wonder "what the hell?" and, how did I miss
that first post with all the rest of the text you snipped from.  Then, it
hit me broadside, the quote is from another list [oakley-synths].  Heck, I
didn't even know such a list existed.  So, I now see I am missing out on
what's going on in Oakley land.  And, I thought it was just quiet over
there.  Sigh....

On MTA connectors, I agree that the 156's are much better.  I got some
MTA-100s for power connections for small protoboard they seems a bit flimsy.
On the other hand, it does provide a format different than the power
connector.  Now, if I just had the rest of the text from the message below,
I might actually know what I was talking about..... Not! <snicker>

Stooge Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: sikorsky <vulture.squadron@...>
To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:41 AM
Subject: [motm] Re: [oakley-synths] Power distribution board


> Basically a row of MTA/molex headers on a PCB, designed to replace bus
> bars etc. It'll be 17" long and have spaces for 13 4-way headers. It'll
> also have two lines that can be used to normalise CV and gate lines.
> Connection will be via 0.1" headers.

hello all,
i'd be more interested if the spacing was make for MTA 156 (ala MOTM)
i just bought a set of MOTM 960s cos you just can't build your own out of
stripboard - whereas you can with 0.1" MTAs
also, if you put three lines instead of two then you can also use it as a
midi buss

but more importantly - WHAT's THIS FILTREX !!?!?!

cheers
paul b