MOTM

I hate "me too" posts... but what else is there to say?

Ideally I'd like the output to blend from TRI (-5v) to SAW (0v) to PULSE
(+5v), but its more important to me that there is a blend in general than
the range of the blend.

Once again, thanks for letting us give some input, Paul!

--PBr

-----Original Message-----
From: jasret@... [mailto:jasret@...]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:45 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [motm] Re: MOTM-310 time again


--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> The only other possibility is: the 4th pots is a 'blend'. The
> VCO has 1 OUT. The 4th jack is PWM IN. With no plug inserted,
> the PULSE is 50%. Else, the input is a -5V to +5V pulse width
> control (no input attenuation).  So you can get SAW to PULSE
> with the blend. This is not as gnarly as the TRI
> stuff, and possibly more
> musically useful.
> 
> Well??!?!?

I like this one.  A single out for the *micro* VCO should be 
sufficient (if it's used as a clock, you'll only need the 
PULSE/SQUARE; if it's running a Miniwave, you'll only need the SAW; 
if it's used as an audio oscillator, THEN the blend will be useful), 
and I find a PWM *jack* more flexible than a PW knob (you can always 
use an external CV source to set a fixed pulse width other than 50%).