MOTM

Has anybody considered the Yamaha CS approach ?
Sustain is always "in the middle" (zero), and you have two
individual sliders for positive (Attack-Decay) and negative
(Attack-Release) amount. Excellent for VCFs, once you get
used to it. Unfortunately not so usefull for VCAs ...

JH.


-----Urspr\ufffdngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tkacs, Ken <ken.tkacs@...>
An: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. April 2001 21:22
Betreff: FW: FW: FW: [motm] Super VC DADSR EG


> That Chroma setup does sound pretty cool.
>
> Maybe a VC AR in combination with the satnddard ADSR we have would do the
> job, be a bit cheaper, and fit on a 1u panel.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mate_stubb@...
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: 4/1/01 3:05 PM
> Subject: Re: FW: FW: [motm] Super VC DADSR EG
>
> My Chroma has an EG setup that is simple, but flexible enough to do
> what you describe.
>
> Basically, it has no ADSRs, but instead 4 ADRs. The Decay can be set
> to infinite to give you an ASR. You apply 2 EGs to the same VCA or
> VCF to get complex envelopes. The sustain level (if set to ASR) is
> controlled by the CV amount applied to the target. I have some
> effective analog piano patches which use 2 EGs with fast attack, one
> with fast decay and no release to do the attack transient, the other
> with slow decay and short release to do the body envelope. The
> attack, decay, and release time are modulation destinations. There is
> also a facility for a velocity switch level, which allows EGs to be
> set to turn on or off above/below a threshold. Pretty advanced for
> its day.
>
> Instead of a big complex module, maybe this would be a more useful
> model for a modular - a 1U VC ADR/ASR that you can gang for more
> complex stuff.
>
> Hey oldtimers - remember when we hashed out our 1U EG designs a year
> or more ago? I still have 2 or 3 panel mockups of the results.
>
> Moe
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>