MOTM

I agree, speed is the necessary one for me too.

Thomas White


>From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...>
>Reply-To: motm@yahoogroups.com
>To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [motm] More UEG tweaks!
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:57:24 -0600
>
>Keep the speed
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Tony Karavidas <tony@...>
>To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 4:16 AM
>Subject: RE: [motm] More UEG tweaks!
>
>
>One more issue I've been working on is the switch bounce. I have found an
>implementation that doens't penalize the response to the leading edge of a
>trigger, BUT it does limit the repetition rate of the GATE.
>For example, if I use 5mS dead time on the rising and falling edge of the
>switch, the input GATE is limited to just under 100Hz. This isn't a problem
>when it comes to using the UEG as an envelope generator. It takes over 60mS
>just to complete all the stages so most likely your input gate repetition
>would be slower than 60mS. If you try to input a faster gate, you simple
>start to chop off the final stages. The issue is with GATED-STEP mode
>(sequencer). Without any debouce code, I can take the UEG up to about 450Hz
>input, and it runs fine all day.
>
>So I need more feedback: Would you like a little debounce is exchange for
>some gate speed, or screw the debounce switch stuff (since you hardly use
>the switch) and keep the speed?
>
>Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com