> SEM.. How did their Programmer module remember/program patch > settings? Seems like some cool technology, perhaps applicable in > some way..? SEMs have molex connectors that allow VC control of the modules inside. You need to set the SEMs to fixed positions and the programmer sends "adjustment" voltages. The SEMs also had *all* of the EGs duplicted. So, a programmer for a 4 voice has enough EGs in it to run an 8-voice, or so I'm told. That would mean 16 ADS EGs in the programmer! If you have ever seen one, you would understand why the most fragile part of a 4-voice is the programmer. It is a "sandwich" of about 4 boards underneath that module. The SEM itself is quite cool, since there is VC control and patchability of just about every function. I have seen some very cool completely patched-out 2-voice systems. You end up with a 4-oscillator, 2-filter modular with an 8-step sequencer in a very small package. It is quite labor intensive to patch them out though. Actually, if Mark Pulver's MIDIwall site is back on line, you can see his patched-out "3-voice" system. It is a very similar concept. Eric __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: [motm] Reverb/SEM/Keyboard randomness
2001-02-19 by alt-mode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.