Re: [milter-greylist] Re: 2.0.2&2.1.3 with SPF1 & SPF2 crashes
2006-02-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... Run nm on libspf. Do you find res_init, or nres_init? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Messages
Browse messages
Page 106 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: 2.0.2&2.1.3 with SPF1 & SPF2 crashes
2006-02-25 by joosteto
... I really don t know how to find out:(. I m using Bind9 as DNS server, but I suppose the resolver comes from somewhere else. I read in the libc6 (gnu libc)
Re: [milter-greylist] 2.0.2&2.1.3 with SPF1 & SPF2 crashes
2006-02-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... An usual cause of crashes: is your libspf linked against a thread-safe DNS resolver? From the README: WARNING: milter-greylist is a multithreaded program.
2.0.2&2.1.3 with SPF1 & SPF2 crashes
2006-02-22 by joosteto
I tried to run milter-greylist on my x86-64 system, with libspf. 2.0.2 failed with SPF2 (didn t try SPF1) 2.1.3 failed with SPF1 and SPF2. System: linux
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch to add non-debug logging of expired greylist entries
2006-02-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... Integrated. Next time, please post the output of diff -U4 old_file new_file, and if you have to copy/paste the patch in the e-mail, make sure your software
Patch to add non-debug logging of expired greylist entries
2006-02-15 by Jeff Rife
If you set debug , then one of the things that gets logged is expired greylist entries. These are useful to know about machines that didn t retry, so they
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-02-09 by Eugene Filatov
... No. Here is part of man for open() from solaris: The open() function returns a file descriptor for the named file that is the lowest file descriptor not
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling 2.1.3 with drac support?
2006-02-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Sure, if someone write it. The change is probably small: an ifdef on dbopen and a configure test. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: [milter-greylist] Compiling 2.1.3 with drac support?
2006-02-04 by Hubertus A. Haniel
... I have been doing some further investigation on this but I am no C expert. It looks to me like there are changes in dbopen in later versions of db. - If I
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-02-02 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... The OS may not give smallest available file descriptor on open(). It is possible that it only wraps around when reaches nofiles limit. It is very likely
Compiling 2.1.3 with drac support?
2006-02-02 by Hubertus A. Haniel
Has anybody managed to do this on a SuSE linux system? I am running SuSE 9.2 professional with db-4.2.52-90 (and the -devel package) and drac 1.12-2 and I am
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-02-01 by Eugene Filatov
... thanks! :-) Eugene.
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-02-01 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
... The original milter-greylist-2.0.2 package, with no modified/patched code /P
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-02-01 by Eugene Filatov
... And what should happen? We will just get errors when sendmail will try to communicate with milter which reached descriptors limit. Tha same problem we will
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-30 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Could you try to limit the number of available file descriptors to 254 as a workaround? Please use the vanilla code of milter-greylist-2.0.2 to test with,
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-27 by Matthias Scheler
... poll() takes a timeout value in milliseconds. That original code only waited 10 microseconds. (void) poll(NULL, 0, 1); seems to be more advisable. Kind
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist vs. unknown users
2006-01-27 by Kai Schaetzl
... Clifford, these are probably grabbed Message-IDs since most of the mail worms can t distinguish between email address and Message-ID, they just grab
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-27 by Eugene Filatov
... Unfortunally, I m not proficient in C and I will be not able to implement it :( I ll offer it to my friend, but I m not sure that he will agree to make it
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Oliver Fromme
... That sounds like a good idea, I think. ... How about not closing the file at all, but keeping it open? Of course, fflush() must be called after each dump
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... I m not sure it s easy to do in a clean way. Do you want to give it a try? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD:
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Matthias Scheler
... Yes, but that would be very slow because of the huge number of calls to malloc(), free() and write(). ... Yes, boot your machine with a 64Bit kernel,
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Eugene Filatov
... We have Solaris 8. And manual says that usleep is unsafe :( ... I m not very proficient in this area, but I think that it s possible to calculate site of
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Matthias Scheler
... Where does he have that information from? The Solaris 9 manual page says: ... That mean it *is* thread safe. ... A memory large enough for the whole dump
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Eugene Filatov
... Yes, it s worked. I found some bugs in output to syslog in previous patch, corrected version is below. Also I increased usleep time. My friend which which
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Eugene Filatov
... It s works well, but still no intresting errors in my syslog. I decreased dump interval to 5 minues. Hope that I catch wrong file descriptor soon :-)
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Matthias Scheler
... Ah, I didn t know that. ... Oops. :-) ... Does that patch actually help? Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Oliver Fromme
... I don t know if this helps, but the canonical way on Solaris to find out what binaries are supported (32bit and/or 64bit) is to use /usr/bin/isainfo. On a
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-26 by Eugene Filatov
... Yes. I modified it a little with help of my friend which knows Solaris and C much better than me :-) My friend told me that FD equal to 255 is also not
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Matthias Scheler
... There s a typo in it ( dupfd instead of dumpfd ) but the compiler will catch that. ... Do we? The check below might be good enough: #if defined(__sun__)
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... That looks painful :-) Eugene, can you finish and test Matthias hack? If it works, I ll integrate it. We also need a configure test to enable the hack.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Matthias Scheler
... Crude untested hack: #ifdef SOLARIS_FD_WORKARROUND if (dumpfd 255) { int retries = 10; while (dumpfd 255) { int lowfd; lowfd = dup(dumpfd); if (lowfd
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Matthias Scheler
... It s 256 for 32Bit binaries. ... Yes, it s specific to the 32Bit ABI. ... Yes, that works arround the problem. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Eugene Filatov
... I my case I have 32bit OS... Best Regards, mailto:eugenef@paco.net Eugene.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Try looking in the list archive. I m now convinced this is the same problem we had before with Solaris: there is a rather low limit on the number of file
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Eugene Filatov
... #uname -a SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-22 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 Eugene.
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Eugene Filatov
... I just looked at file descriptors. greylist has limit set to 2048 and uses at current time approx. 150-180 descriptors (now we have average load at mail
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Yes, I remember now. It simply does not work with 32 bit binaries but you have to compile the 64 bit version.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I recall a stupid limit on solaris with the number of FILE * you could open. The thing was dependent on the ABI, as far as I recall. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
RE: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... Might be disk full condition, but rather the milter may have run out of file pointers.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Oh then it does not crash, it quits. Forget the gdb story. Here is the revelant code section: if ((dumpfd = mkstemp(newdumpfile)) == -1) { syslog(LOG_ERR,
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I don t think it s such a problem. gdb will just sit down quitely until the kernel tells it that the traced process got a signal. What you need is a way to
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Eugene Filatov
... In addition to my previos letter. The following string I found in my syslog before crash. Maybe it will be helpful. Jan 25 16:08:39 snark milter-greylist:
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Eugene Filatov
... I use small script which starts greylist again after crash. I don t know how to start it automatically again under gdb. Another bad thing is that sometimes
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Won t any process stop when it crashes? ... It s not on its own to decide that. Maybe it does not have write access to its current directory. ... If it s
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-2.0.2 crash
2006-01-25 by Eugene Filatov
... I upgraded till milter-greylist 2.1.2 and found that -g flag is already in CFLAGS in makefile. I don t want to run milter-greylist under gdb, because I
initscript on CentOS3
2006-01-23 by Mailing List
Using milter-greylist 2.0.2 When I reboot my server the init script simply hangs there, preventing the following services from starting. If I disable the
Few questions2.
2006-01-23 by tirilimpspoolteist
1) Why to show manual added acl based whitelisted stuff in logs, like - milter-greylist: k0N8LMLv009686: skipping greylist because sender DNS name
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist vs. unknown users
2006-01-23 by Martin Paul
... I ve solved the problem by listing all valid email addresses that should be protected by greylisting in greylist.conf, and changing the default action to
Re: [milter-greylist] Greylist vs. unknown users
2006-01-22 by Matthias Scheler
... That s not true. Try to connect to mail.zhadum.de and see for yourself: 220 colwyn.zhadum.org.uk ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.3/8.13.3; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:25:09
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 2.1.3 is out
2006-01-22 by Sysadmin
Hello. ... Great, it compiles fine. Btw, the link is wrong, the right is http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-2.1.3.tgz -- Sysadmin