Moritz Both <mb@...> wrote: > I agree. We talk about delaying a message for a couple of hours, not > about dropping it. Probably I'm not aware of all situations in which a > null sender message is sent, but frankly I cannot think of a situation > where a well-behaved MTA would send one to multiple recipients?! It's true I have trouble to imagine a legal situation where we would have a null sender and multiple recipients. Ideas, anyone? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre! http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php manu@netbsd.org
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-06 by manu@netbsd.org