Scot L. Harris schrieb: > Personally I think keeping it simple is the best option, if it has a > null sender delay it by default. > > Trying to get to tricky with it will result in problems which will > result in more complex schemes to resolve those problems etc. I agree. We talk about delaying a message for a couple of hours, not about dropping it. Probably I'm not aware of all situations in which a null sender message is sent, but frankly I cannot think of a situation where a well-behaved MTA would send one to multiple recipients?! Wouldn't a legetimate null sender message almost always have one recipient only since it is an error message to a single sender of another message? The patch will make milter-greylist to tempfail if any of the recipients is not white listed. Moritz
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-06 by Moritz Both