eugene_kurmanin <ubr@...> wrote: > What about dispute? > I have simply offered to add technology of the checking the return > address in analogy as is done in Exim, Postfix, milter-sender by > Snert in milter-greylist. > If this not it is necessary, i do not :) My point of view is that if you can get the functionnality in another milter, then you should do so. Adding unrelated functionnality to milter-greylist will lead to code bloat, which leads to bugs and security holes, themselves leading to the dark side of the force. What would you win by incorporating callbacks to milter-greylist, compared to using milter-greylist and milter-sender on the same machine? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: quiet option
2004-11-22 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.