What about dispute? I have simply offered to add technology of the checking the return address in analogy as is done in Exim, Postfix, milter-sender by Snert in milter-greylist. If this not it is necessary, i do not :) --- In milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com, Matthias Scheler <tron@z...> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 04:30:15PM -0000, eugene_kurmanin wrote: > > > Some spam or virus SMPT engines use empty envelope addresses, too. > > Sure. But for viruses is exist another technology to detect & delete > > (remove executable attach, filter mail by helo = your domain, > > antivirus plugins...) > > So what? Greylisting is very useful to keep that junk away from my system. > > > > Milter Greylist isn't blocking it, it's delaying it. > > I see :) But i don't want to block my outbound mail to system that > > used callback sender verification with NULL sender envelope. > > Me neither. But white listing <> isn't a good option. > > Kind regards > > -- > Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
Message
Re: quiet option
2004-11-22 by eugene_kurmanin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.