On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:57:07AM +1100, Michael Mansour wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:13:35PM +0200, manu@... wrote: > > > Petar Bogdanovic <petar@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Let's see how Sendmail headers look like when RDNS is not available. > > > > We can then make that the default behaviour and add an option for > > > > backward compatibility? > > > > > > There are certainly people out of there that made scripts to parse > > > milter-greylist log output. If you change the behaviour, this is nasty > > > for them. IMO the default setting should be backaward compatibility. > > > > Ok, I dug through some pieces of the sendmail code and did some > > tests on an emulated Ubuntu installation: It seems that the way > > milter-greylist logs unresolvable clients is consistent with that of > > sendmail. > > > > Sendmail, however, has not the same approach when it comes to > > received headers: > > > > log (rdns): relay=some.host.name. [1.2.3.4] > > log (no-rdns): relay=[5.6.7.8] [5.6.7.8] > > > > hdr (rdns): (some.host.name. [1.2.3.4]) > > hdr (no-rdns): ([5.6.7.8]) > > > > I think we should move that tiny piece of code into spamd.c and make > > the injected received header look like one from sendmail. > > Does this mean that you have to be running spamd to take advantage of that code? Not [1]spamd but [2]spamd. (man greylist.conf) Petar Bogdanovic [1] http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/ [2] http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamd.html
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] lists composed of spf servers
2009-05-10 by Petar Bogdanovic
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.